Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34791655›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2021

Low-dose CT reconstruction with Noise2Noise network and testing-time fine-tuning.

Dufan Wu, Kyungsang Kim, Quanzheng Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Noise2Noise Diffusion for Thin-Slice Brain CT Denoising without Clean Training Data.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Systematic Review on Learning-based Spectral CT.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dufan WuCenter for Advanced Medical Computing and Analysis, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Kyungsang KimCenter for Advanced Medical Computing and Analysis, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Quanzheng LiCenter for Advanced Medical Computing and Analysis, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Gordon Center for Medical Imaging · US

Funding

Study of Brain Spreading Pathways of Tau and Amyloid-Beta in (pre)clinical ADRF1AG052653 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LI, QUANZHENG, SEPULCRE, JORGE · 2017 to 2017
$1.4M
HHS | NIH | National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) 5P41EB022544HHS | NIH | National Institute on Aging (NIA) 1RF1AG052653NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG052653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDeep learning-based image denoising and reconstruction methods demonstrated promising performance on low-dose CT imaging in recent years. However, most existing deep learning-based low-dose CT reconstruction methods require normal-dose images for training. Sometimes such clean images do not exist such as for dynamic CT imaging or very large patients. The purpose of this work is to develop a low-dose CT image reconstruction algorithm based on deep learning which does not need clean images for training.

methodsIn this paper, we proposed a novel reconstruction algorithm where the image prior was expressed via the Noise2Noise network, whose weights were fine-tuned along with the image during the iterative reconstruction. The Noise2Noise network built a self-consistent loss by projection data splitting and mapping the corresponding filtered backprojection (FBP) results to each other with a deep neural network. Besides, the network weights are optimized along with the image to be reconstructed under an alternating optimization scheme. In the proposed method, no clean image is needed for network training and the testing-time fine-tuning leads to optimization for each reconstruction.

resultsWe used the 2016 Low-dose CT Challenge dataset to validate the feasibility of the proposed method. We compared its performance to several existing iterative reconstruction algorithms that do not need clean training data, including total variation, non-local mean, convolutional sparse coding, and Noise2Noise denoising. It was demonstrated that the proposed Noise2Noise reconstruction achieved better RMSE, SSIM and texture preservation compared to the other methods. The performance is also robust against the different noise levels, hyperparameters, and network structures used in the reconstruction. Furthermore, we also demonstrated that the proposed methods achieved competitive results without any pre-training of the network at all, that is, using randomly initialized network weights during testing. The proposed iterative reconstruction algorithm also has empirical convergence with and without network pre-training.

conclusionsThe proposed Noise2Noise reconstruction method can achieve promising image quality in low-dose CT image reconstruction. The method works both with and without pre-training, and only noisy data are required for pre-training.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsHumansPhantoms, ImagingResearch DesignTomography, X-Ray Computedcomputed tomographydeep learningimage reconstructionNoise2Noise

Identifiers

PMID34791655
PMCPMC11216369
OpenAlexW3212800953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.