Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34791426›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2022

Slow Recovery from Inbreeding Depression Generated by the Complex Genetic Architecture of Segregating Deleterious Mutations.

Paula E Adams, Anna B Crist, Ellen M Young, John H Willis, Patrick C Phillips, Janna L Fierst

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Chemosensory adaptations inBiology letters · 2025
    Article
  4. Conservative evolution of genetic and genomic features inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paula E AdamsDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Anna B CristDepartment of Genomes and Genetics, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Ellen M YoungInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
John H WillisInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Patrick C PhillipsInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Janna L FierstDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3639-8829
University of Oregon · USUniversity of Alabama · USInstitut Pasteur · FR

Funding

Systems genomics of complex traitsR35GM131838 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI Patrick C. Phillips · 2019 to 2026
$2.7M
Structural variants and the locus of evolutionR35GM147245 · NIGMS · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI Janna Lynn Fierst · 2022 to 2026
$1.8M
Systems genetics of natural variation in stress response pathwaysR01GM102511 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI PHILLIPS, PATRICK C. · 2015 to 2018
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102511NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131838NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM147245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The deleterious effects of inbreeding have been of extreme importance to evolutionary biology, but it has been difficult to characterize the complex interactions between genetic constraints and selection that lead to fitness loss and recovery after inbreeding. Haploid organisms and selfing organisms like the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans are capable of rapid recovery from the fixation of novel deleterious mutation; however, the potential for recovery and genomic consequences of inbreeding in diploid, outcrossing organisms are not well understood. We sought to answer two questions: 1) Can a diploid, outcrossing population recover from inbreeding via standing genetic variation and new mutation? and 2) How does allelic diversity change during recovery? We inbred C. remanei, an outcrossing relative of C. elegans, through brother-sister mating for 30 generations followed by recovery at large population size. Inbreeding reduced fitness but, surprisingly, recovery from inbreeding at large populations sizes generated only very moderate fitness recovery after 300 generations. We found that 65% of ancestral single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were fixed in the inbred population, far fewer than the theoretical expectation of ∼99%. Under recovery, 36 SNPs across 30 genes involved in alimentary, muscular, nervous, and reproductive systems changed reproducibly across replicates, indicating that strong selection for fitness recovery does exist. Our results indicate that recovery from inbreeding depression via standing genetic variation and mutation is likely to be constrained by the large number of segregating deleterious variants present in natural populations, limiting the capacity for recovery of small populations.

Indexed as

Inbreeding DepressionAllelesAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansInbreedingMaleMutationconservation geneticsgenomicsinbreeding depressionnematode

Identifiers

PMID34791426
PMCPMC8789292
OpenAlexW3213460995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.