Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34791313›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2022

Technical note: overcoming host contamination in bovine vaginal metagenomic samples with nanopore adaptive sequencing.

Chian Teng Ong, Elizabeth M Ross, Gry B Boe-Hansen, Conny Turni, Ben J Hayes, Ala E Tabor

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Application of nanopore adaptive sequencing in pathogen detection of a patient withFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chian Teng OngCentre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Queensland 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2432-2509
Elizabeth M RossCentre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Queensland 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7521-3671
Gry B Boe-HansenFaculty of Science, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Conny TurniCentre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Ben J HayesCentre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Ala E TaborCentre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Queensland 4072, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Meat and Livestock Australia Donor Company project P.PSH.0799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal metagenomic studies, in which host-associated microbiomes are profiled, are an increasingly important contribution to our understanding of the physiological functions, health and susceptibility to diseases of livestock. One of the major challenges in these studies is host DNA contamination, which limits the sequencing capacity for metagenomic content and reduces the accuracy of metagenomic profiling. This is the first study comparing the effectiveness of different sequencing methods for profiling bovine vaginal metagenomic samples. We compared the new method of Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) adaptive sequencing, which can be used to target or eliminate defined genetic sequences, to standard ONT sequencing, Illumina 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing, and Illumina shotgun sequencing. The efficiency of each method in recovering the metagenomic data and recalling the metagenomic profiles was assessed. ONT adaptive sequencing yielded a higher amount of metagenomic data than the other methods per 1 Gb of sequence data. The increased sequencing efficiency of ONT adaptive sequencing consequently reduced the amount of raw data needed to provide sufficient coverage for the metagenomic samples with high host-to-microbe DNA ratio. Additionally, the long reads generated by ONT adaptive sequencing retained the continuity of read information, which benefited the in-depth annotations for both taxonomical and functional profiles of the metagenome. The different methods resulted in the identification of different taxa. Genera Clostridium, which was identified at low abundances and categorized under Order "Unclassified Clostridiales" when using the 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing method, was identified to be the dominant genera in the sample when sequenced with the three other methods. Additionally, higher numbers of annotated genes were identified with ONT adaptive sequencing, which also produced high coverage on most of the commonly annotated genes. This study illustrates the advantages of ONT adaptive sequencing in improving the amount of metagenomic data derived from microbiome samples with high host-to-microbe DNA ratio and the advantage of long reads in preserving intact information for accurate annotations.

Indexed as

NanoporesNanopore SequencingAnimalsCattleFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomeMetagenomicsSequence Analysis, DNAadaptive sequencinghost contaminationlong readmetagenomeOxford Nanopore

Identifiers

PMID34791313
PMCPMC8722758
OpenAlexW3213977848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.