Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34791241›Full record

SynthesisThe international journal of neuropsychopharmacology2022

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Tapan K Parikh, Jeffrey R Strawn, John T Walkup, Paul E Croarkin

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tapan K ParikhPritzker Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6313-2372
Jeffrey R StrawnAnxiety Disorders Research Program, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
John T WalkupPritzker Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Paul E CroarkinMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Northwestern University · USMayo Clinic · USUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

Improving the Effectiveness and Safety of Escitalopram in Pediatric Anxiety Disorders Using Pharmacogenetically-guided DosingR01HD099775 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI RAMSEY, LAURA B, STRAWN, JEFFREY ROBERT · 2020 to 2024
$2.9M
Glutamatergic and GABAergic Biomarkers in rTMS for Adolescent DepressionR01MH113700 · NIMH · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CROARKIN, PAUL E · 2017 to 2021
$2.5M
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Sequential Bilateral Accelerated Theta Burst Stimulation in Adolescents with Suicidal Ideation Associated with Major Depressive DisorderR01MH124655 · NIMH · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CROARKIN, PAUL E · 2020 to 2023
$2.4M
Estracellular Vesicles as Non-Invasive Predictors of Antidepressant Outcomes in Pediatric AnxietyR01HD098757 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI STRAWN, JEFFREY ROBERT · 2019 to 2024
$2.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD098757NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD099775NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113700NIMH NIH HHS R01MH113700NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH124655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnxiety disorders such as generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) impact 10% of the US population, and many patients do not completely respond to first-line treatments (e.g., selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and psychotherapy). Given the dearth of evidence for non-pharmacologic, non-psychotherapeutic interventions, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in adults with GAD.

methodsA systematic literature review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted. Pre- and post-treatment anxiety scores were extracted, and a random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to determine the magnitude of improvement (standardized mean difference). Standard assessments of heterogeneity (e.g., Q-statistic, I2, and τ 2) and publication bias were performed.

resultsThe initial search resulted in 3194 citations, of which 6 studies were included in the meta-analysis. In total, 152 patients were studied, including 97 patients who received active treatment and 55 who received sham treatment, and heterogeneity was modest (I2 13.32, Q = 5.77). In patients with GAD, rTMS produced a standardized mean difference of -1.857 (confidence interval: -2.219 to -1.494; P < .001) with a prediction interval of -2.55 to -1.16.

conclusionsThe results suggest a robust effect of rTMS in GAD in the context of limited, heterogenous studies. Rigorously designed, randomized controlled trials of rTMS for GAD and related anxiety disorders are urgently needed. These studies will provide opportunities for biomarker development and integration of concurrent evidence-based psychotherapy to maximize results.

Indexed as

AdultAnxiety DisordersHumansTranscranial Magnetic StimulationTreatment OutcomeAnxiolyticclinical trialHamilton anxiety rating scaleneuromodulationTMS

Identifiers

PMID34791241
PMCPMC8832221
OpenAlexW3213490490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.