Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34791190›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2021

Eye-Transcriptome and Genome-Wide Sequencing for Scolecophidia: Implications for Inferring the Visual System of the Ancestral Snake.

David J Gower, James F Fleming, Davide Pisani, Freek J Vonk, Harald M I Kerkkamp, Leo Peichl, Sonja Meimann, Nicholas R Casewell, Christiaan V Henkel, Michael K Richardson and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

David J GowerLife Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1725-8863
James F FlemingSchool of Life Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Davide PisaniSchool of Life Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0949-6682
Freek J VonkNaturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Harald M I KerkkampInstitute of Biology, University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leo PeichlInstitute of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Dr. Senckenberg Anatomy, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8141-0911
Sonja MeimannInstitute of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Dr. Senckenberg Anatomy, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Nicholas R CasewellCentre for Snakebite Research & Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8035-4719
Christiaan V HenkelInstitute of Biology, University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9838-8215
Michael K RichardsonInstitute of Biology, University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1222-8101
Kate L SandersSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Bruno F SimõesSchool of Life Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5390-6541
Leiden University · NLGoethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity of Bristol · GBKeio University · JPLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBNatural History Museum · GBNaturalis Biodiversity Center · NLThe University of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular genetic data have recently been incorporated in attempts to reconstruct the ecology of the ancestral snake, though this has been limited by a paucity of data for one of the two main extant snake taxa, the highly fossorial Scolecophidia. Here we present and analyze vision genes from the first eye-transcriptomic and genome-wide data for Scolecophidia, for Anilios bicolor, and A. bituberculatus, respectively. We also present immunohistochemistry data for retinal anatomy and visual opsin-gene expression in Anilios. Analyzed in the context of 19 lepidosaurian genomes and 12 eye transcriptomes, the new genome-wide and transcriptomic data provide evidence for a much more reduced visual system in Anilios than in non-scolecophidian (=alethinophidian) snakes and in lizards. In Anilios, there is no evidence of the presence of 7 of the 12 genes associated with alethinophidian photopic (cone) phototransduction. This indicates extensive gene loss and many of these candidate gene losses occur also in highly fossorial mammals with reduced vision. Although recent phylogenetic studies have found evidence for scolecophidian paraphyly, the loss in Anilios of visual genes that are present in alethinophidians implies that the ancestral snake had a better-developed visual system than is known for any extant scolecophidian.

Indexed as

LizardsTranscriptomeAnimalsEvolution, MolecularMammalsOpsinsPhylogenySnakesOpsinsgene lossopsinsphylogenyregressive evolutionSquamatavision

Identifiers

PMID34791190
PMCPMC8643396
OpenAlexW3211845381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.