Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34791187›Full record

SynthesisFamily practice2022

Clinician responses to cannabis use during pregnancy and lactation: a systematic review and integrative mixed-methods research synthesis.

Janelle Panday, Shipra Taneja, Anuoluwa Popoola, Rachael Pack, Devon Greyson, Sarah D McDonald, Morgan Black, Beth Murray-Davis, Elizabeth Darling, Meredith Vanstone

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Family practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cannabis and Nicotine Substance Use Coercion During the Perinatal Period.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cannabis and Pregnancy.Current psychiatry reports · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Janelle PandayDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2994-6292
Shipra TanejaDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2623-8952
Anuoluwa PopoolaDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4909-5808
Rachael PackCenter for Education Research and Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0293-6294
Devon GreysonDepartment of Communication, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4860-384X
Sarah D McDonaldDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4461-2178
Morgan BlackDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1499-4854
Beth Murray-DavisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9963-7313
Elizabeth DarlingDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2675-3222
Meredith VanstoneDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7347-6259

Funding

CIHR 167972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerinatal cannabis use is increasing, and clinician counselling is an important aspect of reducing the potential harm of cannabis use during pregnancy and lactation. To understand current counselling practices, we conducted a systematic review and integrative mixed-methods synthesis to determine "how do perinatal clinicians respond to pregnant and lactating patients who use cannabis?"

methodsWe searched 6 databases up until 2021-05-31. Eligible studies described the attitudes, perceptions, or beliefs of perinatal clinician about cannabis use during pregnancy or lactation. Eligible clinicians were those whose practice particularly focusses on pregnant and postpartum patients. The search was not limited by study design, geography, or year. We used a convergent integrative analysis method to extract relevant findings for inductive analysis.

resultsThirteen studies were included; describing perspectives of 1,366 clinicians in 4 countries. We found no unified approach to screening and counselling. Clinicians often cited insufficient evidence around the effects of perinatal cannabis use and lacked confidence in counselling about use. At times, this meant clinicians did not address cannabis use with patients. Most counselled for cessation and there was little recognition of the varied reasons that patients might use cannabis, and an over-reliance on counselling focussed on the legal implications of use.

conclusionCurrent approaches to responding to cannabis use might result in inadequate counselling. Counselling may be improved through increased education and training, which would facilitate conversations to mitigate the potential harm of perinatal cannabis use while recognizing the benefits patients perceive.

Indexed as

CannabisLactationBreast FeedingFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodPregnancycannabiscounsellingdelivery of health carelactationperceptionpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID34791187
PMCPMC9155166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.