A sex-specific prediction model is not enough to achieve equality for women in preventative cardiovascular medicine.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

1. Female sex is associated with short-term mortality in coronary artery bypass grafting patients: A propensity-matched analysis.Heliyon · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  SCORE2 models allow consideration of sex-specific cardiovascular disease risks by region.2022
• Comment on
  SCORE2 risk prediction algorithms: new models to estimate 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease in Europe.2021

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as