ReviewAI and ethics2021
Public acceptance and perception of autonomous vehicles: a comprehensive review.
Review in AI and ethics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social Perception of Autonomous Mobility: A Survey on Public Transport Pilots in Switzerland.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Improving intelligent perception and decision optimization of pedestrian crossing scenarios in autonomous driving environments through large visual language models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Elucidation of user autonomous driving system preference mechanisms under the extension of internal and external factors.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring Chinese Consumers' Perception and Potential Acceptance of Cell-Cultured Meat and Plant-Based Meat: A Focus Group Study and Content Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool.AI and ethics · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploring the general acceptance factor for shared automated vehicles: the impact of personality traits and experimentally altered information.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Article
- A survey on 3D object detection in real time for autonomous driving.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2024Review
- Article
- Trolleys, crashes, and perception-a survey on how current autonomous vehicles debates invoke problematic expectations.AI and ethics · 2024Article
- Shifting Perceptions and Emotional Responses to Autonomous Vehicles Using Simulated Experiences.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Rebound effects undermine carbon footprint reduction potential of autonomous electric vehicles.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- Analyzing Factors Influencing Situation Awareness in Autonomous Vehicles-A Survey.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Exploring the artificial intelligence "Trust paradox": Evidence from a survey experiment in the United States.PloS one · 2023Article
- Physiological measurements in social acceptance of self driving technologies.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Translating the Machine: Skills that Human Clinicians Must Develop in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autonomous vehicles (AVs) or self-driving cars have the potential to provide many benefits such as improving mobility and reducing the energy and emissions consumed, travel time, and vehicle ownership. Thus, in the last few years, both research and industry have put significant efforts to develop AVs. However, laws and regulations are not ready yet for this switch and the legal sector is unable to take the lead but follow the development of AVs. Besides, the social acceptance is considered as a main key factor for the success of any new technology. Despite the enthusiastic speculation of AVs, little is known about the public acceptance and perception of the AVs technology or the factors that influence the public acceptance. This paper reviews the previous studies that focuses on testing the public acceptance and perception of AVs and sketches out the main trends in this area to provide some directions and recommendations for the future. This paper focuses on the influence of safety, ethics, liability, regulations, and the recent pandemic on the public acceptance of AVs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.