ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
Development of immune gene pair-based signature predictive of prognosis and immunotherapy in esophageal cancer.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-Omics Analysis of Aberrances and Functional Implications of IRF5 in Digestive Tract Tumours.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Prognostic value of genomic mutation signature associated with immune microenvironment in southern Chinese patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2024Article
- Prediction of Survival in Patients With Esophageal Cancer After Immunotherapy Based on Small-Size Follow-Up Data.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Immune characteristics and genetic markers of esophageal cancer by single-cell analysis: implications for immunotherapy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Improvement of ACK1-targeted therapy efficacy in lung adenocarcinoma using chloroquine or bafilomycin A1.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- Development and validation of a prognostic model for esophageal carcinoma based on immune microenvironment using system bioinformatics.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Immunotherapy for Squamous Esophageal Cancer: A Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEsophageal cancer (EC) is one of the deadliest solid malignancies, mainly consisting of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and adenocarcinoma (EAC). Robust biomarkers that can improve patient risk stratification are needed to optimize cancer management. We sought to establish potent prognostic signatures with immune-related gene (IRG) pairs for ESCC and EAC.
methodsWe obtained differentially expressed IRGs by intersecting the Immunology Database and Analysis Portal (ImmPort) with the transcriptome data set of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-ESCC and EAC cohorts. A novel rank-based pairwise comparison algorithm was applied to select effective IRG pairs (IRGPs), followed by constructing a prognostic IRGP signature via the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model. We assessed the predictive power of the IRGP signatures on prognosis, tumor-infiltrating immune cells, and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy in EC. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were used to evaluate the clinical significance of IRGPs. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the association of overall survival (OS) with IRGPs and clinical characteristics.
resultsWe built a 19-IRGP signature for ESCC (n=75) and a 17-IRGP signature for EAC (n=78), with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.931 and 0.803, respectively. IRGP signature-derived risk scores stratified patients into low- and high-risk groups with significantly different OS in ESCC and EAC (P<0.001). Nomogram and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the clinical relevance of the prognostic signatures, achieving a C-index of 0.973 in ESCC and 0.880 in EAC. The risk scores were associated with immune and ESTIMATE (Estimation of STromal and Immune cells in MAlignant Tumor tissues using Expression data) scores and the composition of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. The association between risk score and human leukocyte antigens (HLAs), mismatch repair (MMR) genes, and immune checkpoint molecules demonstrated its predictive value for ICI response. Differential immune characteristics and predictive value of the risk score were observed in EAC.
conclusionsThe established immune signatures showed great promise in predicting prognosis, tumor immunogenicity, and immunotherapy response in ESCC and EAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.