Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34790735›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021

Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus hysteroscopic approach in patients with previous cesarean scar defect: a retrospective cohort study.

Qi Zhang, Lei Lei, Aiqian Zhang, Lingxiao Zou, Dabao Xu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qi Zhang *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Lei Lei *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Aiqian ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Lingxiao ZouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Dabao XuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Third Xiangya Hospital · CNCentral South University · CNObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and obstetric outcomes of laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgery in patients with previous cesarean scar defect (PCSD).

methodsA retrospective cohort analysis was performed on women who underwent laparoscopic or hysteroscopic surgery for PCSD from 2016 to 2019 at the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. Among these participants, 13 underwent laparoscopic surgery and 33 received hysteroscopic surgery.

resultsSignificant differences were displayed in the operative times (156.9±42.3

conclusionsBoth laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgery are safe and effective treatments for PCSD patients, and hysteroscopic surgery is more efficient for PCSD patients.

Indexed as

clinical effectivenesshysteroscopylaparoscopyPrevious cesarean scar defect (PCSD)surgical approach

Identifiers

PMID34790735
PMCPMC8576701
OpenAlexW3205538541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.