Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34790722›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021

Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment determines survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients (NEOCRTEC5010).

Jianfei Shen, Min Kong, Hong Yang, Ke Jin, Yuping Chen, Wentao Fang, Zhentao Yu, Weimin Mao, Jiaqing Xiang, Yongtao Han and 27 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01216527 (A Phase III, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study of Neo-adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Surgery for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Esophageal Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01216527 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

A Phase III, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study of Neo-adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Surgery for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Esophageal Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2007 to 2019Enrolled430ConditionsSquamous Cell Esophageal CarcinomaArmsNeo-adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy followed by Surgery, surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Differential Survival Outcomes of Satisfactory Tumour Response (ypStage I) Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy of Oesophageal Squamous Cell Cancer.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors.

Jianfei Shen *Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Techniques & Rapid Rehabilitation of Digestive System Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Linhai, China.
Min Kong *Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Techniques & Rapid Rehabilitation of Digestive System Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Linhai, China.
Hong Yang *Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Ke Jin *Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Techniques & Rapid Rehabilitation of Digestive System Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Linhai, China.
Yuping Chen *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Wentao Fang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Zhentao YuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Weimin MaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Jiaqing XiangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Yongtao HanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Zhijian ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Haihua YangDepartment of Radiotherapy, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, China.
Jiaming WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Qingsong PangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Xiao ZhengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Huanjun YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Tao LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Xu ZhangSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Qun LiSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Geng WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Teng MaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Xufeng GuoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Ting LinSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Mengzhong LiuSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Dehua MaKey Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Techniques & Rapid Rehabilitation of Digestive System Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Linhai, China.
Minhua YeKey Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Techniques & Rapid Rehabilitation of Digestive System Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Linhai, China.
Chunguo WangKey Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Techniques & Rapid Rehabilitation of Digestive System Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Linhai, China.
Zheng WangKey Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Techniques & Rapid Rehabilitation of Digestive System Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Linhai, China.
Alessandro BrunelliDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, St. James's University Hospital, Bexley Wing, Leeds, UK.
Robert J CerfolioDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Xavier Benoit D'JournoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Diseases of Esophagus, Aix-Marseille University, Hôpital Nord, Chemin des Bourrely, Marseille Cedex, France.
Hiran C FernandoDepartment of Surgery, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, USA.
Florian LordickUniversity Cancer Center Leipzig, University Medicine Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Jianhua FuSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Baofu Chen *Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Techniques & Rapid Rehabilitation of Digestive System Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Linhai, China.
Chengchu Zhu *Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Techniques & Rapid Rehabilitation of Digestive System Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Linhai, China.
written on behalf of the AME Thoracic Surgery Collaborative Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies have exclusively investigated the value of pathological complete response (pCR), in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients, although it is a clinically significant parameter to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) on treatment outcome after surgery. The aim of our study was to explore the relationship between pCR after nCRT and survival among patients with local ESCC.

methodsAll patients receiving nCRT followed by surgery in NEOCRTEC5010-trial (NCT01216527) were included. Non-pCR patients were classified into three subgroups: ypTanyN0M0, ypT0NanyM0 and ypTanyNanyM0. The Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was employed to evaluate disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate regression analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model to identify clinicopathological parameters associated with pCR.

resultsAmong the 185 patients included, 80 (43.2%) achieved pCR after nCRT. The mean survival time of the pCR group was significantly longer than that of the non-pCR group (92.6

conclusionspCR after nCRT is an important prognostic indicator of OS and DFS in patients with ESCC. In addition, lymph-node status could represent an important parameter in the prognostic evaluation of esophageal cancer patients.

Indexed as

esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC)neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT)Pathological responsesurgerysurvival

Identifiers

PMID34790722
PMCPMC8576689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.