Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34790720›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021

Comparative healing of swine skin following incisions with different surgical devices.

Yuting Zhong, Yufan Wei, Ningning Min, Qingyu Guan, Jin Zhao, Junyong Zhu, Huayu Hu, Rui Geng, Chenyan Hong, Yashuang Ji and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Porcine Wound Models: The Gold Standard for Translational Research in Cutaneous Healing.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuting ZhongMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.
Yufan WeiDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ningning MinDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qingyu GuanDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jin ZhaoDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Junyong ZhuDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Huayu HuDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Rui GengMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.
Chenyan HongDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yashuang JiDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jie LiDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yiqiong ZhengDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yanjun ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiru LiDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chinese People's Liberation Army · CNPeople's Liberation Army No. 150 Hospital · CNNankai University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectrosurgical technology is widely used in surgical dissection and hemostasis, but the generated heat creates thermal injury to adjacent tissues and delays wound healing. The plasma blade (PB) applies pulsed radiofrequency (RF) to generate electrical plasma along the edge of a thin, flat, insulated electrode, minimizing collateral tissue damage. This study aimed to evaluate wound healing in swine skin following incision with a new surgical system that applies low-temperature plasma (NTS-100), a foreign PB, conventional electrosurgery (ES), and a scalpel blade.

methods

resultsLocal operating temperature was reduced significantly with NTS-100 (cut mode 83.12±23.55 °C; coagulation mode 90.07±10.6 °C) compared with PB (cut mode 94.46±11.48 °C; coagulation mode 100.23±6.58 °C, P<0.05) and ES (cut mode 208.99±34.33 °C, P<0.01; coagulation mode 233.37±28.69 °C, P<0.01)

conclusionsThe local operating temperature of NTS-100 was lower than PB, and NTS-100 had similarly reliable safety and efficacy.

Indexed as

electrosurgery (ES)Plasma blade (PB)scar formationthermal damagewound healing

Identifiers

PMID34790720
PMCPMC8576679
OpenAlexW3197601931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.