Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34790570›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Application Value of Magnetic Resonance Radiomics and Clinical Nomograms in Evaluating the Sensitivity of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Chunmiao Hu, Dechun Zheng, Xisheng Cao, Peipei Pang, Yanhong Fang, Tao Lu, Yunbin Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Radiomics in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chunmiao HuDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Dechun ZhengDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Xisheng CaoDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Peipei PangDepartment of Pharmaceuticals Diagnosis, GE Healthcare, Hangzhou, China.
Yanhong FangDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Tao LuDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yunbin ChenDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital · CNFujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo predict the sensitivity of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) based on magnetic resonance (MR) radiomics and clinical nomograms prior to NACT. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom January 2014 to July 2015, 284 consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed NPC underwent 3.0 T MR imaging (MRI) before initiating NACT. The patients' data were randomly assigned to a training set (n = 200) or a test set (n = 84) at a ratio of 7:3. The clinical data included sex, tumor (T) stage, lymph node (N) stage, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, and the plasma concentration of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA. The regions of interest (ROI) were manually segmented on the axial T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) sequences using ITK-SNAP software. The radiomics data were post-processed using AK software. Moreover, the Maximum Relevance Minimum Redundancy (mRMR) algorithm and the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) were adopted for dimensionality reduction to screen for the features that best predicted the treatment efficacy, and clinical risk factors were used in combination with radiomics scores (Rad-scores) to construct the clinical radiomics-based nomogram. DeLong's test was utilized to compare the area under the curve (AUC) values of the clinical radiomics-based nomogram, radiomics model, and clinical nomogram. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was employed to evaluate each model's net benefit.

resultsThe clinical nomogram was constructed based on data from patients who were randomly assigned according to T2WI and enhanced T1WI sequences. In the training set, the T2WI sequence-based clinical radiomics nomogram and the radiomics model outperformed the clinical nomogram in predicting the NACT efficacy (AUC, 0.81

conclusionThe clinical radiomics-based nomogram improved the prediction of NACT efficacy, with the T2WI sequence-based clinical radiomics achieving the best effect.

Indexed as

efficacy evaluationmagnetic resonance imagingnasopharyngeal carcinomaneoadjuvant chemotherapyradiomics

Identifiers

PMID34790570
PMCPMC8591169
OpenAlexW3210222891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.