Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34790538›Full record

ReviewEndoscopy international open2021

Antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and antireflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Enrique Rodríguez de Santiago, Carlos Teruel Sanchez-Vegazo, Beatriz Peñas, Yuto Shimamura, Mayo Tanabe, Noelia Álvarez-Díaz, Sofía Parejo, Sumi Kazuya, Natalia Marcos-Carrasco, Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endoscopy international open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Efficacy and Safety of Closure-Focused Anti-Reflux Mucoplasty Compared With Conventional ARMS: A Propensity Score-Matched Study (With Video).Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on the diagnosis and management of GERD: methodology and review of evidence.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Introducing antireflux mucoplasty with valve: a novel endoscopic treatment for GERD.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2024
    Article
  19. Antireflux mucosectomy as an effective treatment for GERD after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2024
    Article
  20. Closure in antireflux mucoplasty using anchor prong clips: dead space-eliminating technique.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Enrique Rodríguez de SantiagoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), CIBEREHD, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Teruel Sanchez-VegazoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), CIBEREHD, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Beatriz PeñasDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), CIBEREHD, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Yuto ShimamuraDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Mayo TanabeDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Noelia Álvarez-DíazMedical library, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Sofía ParejoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), CIBEREHD, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Sumi KazuyaDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Natalia Marcos-CarrascoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), CIBEREHD, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Enrique Vazquez-SequeirosDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), CIBEREHD, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Haruhiro InoueDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Agustín AlbillosDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), CIBEREHD, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID34790538
PMCPMC8589565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.