Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34790536›Full record

ReviewEndoscopy international open2021

Endoscopic submucosal dissection: How to be more efficient?

Thomas Lambin, Jérôme Rivory, Timothée Wallenhorst, Romain Legros, Frédéric Monzy, Jérémie Jacques, Mathieu Pioche

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endoscopy international open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05347446 (Hybrid Versus Non-Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Polyps), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05347446 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Hybrid Versus Non-Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Polyps: A Randomized Trial (SHORT-ESD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAdventHealthRan2022 to 2024Enrolled247ConditionsColorectal LesionsArmsHybrid ESD, Non-hybrid ESD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of Reviewing Procedure With Visual Gaze Patterns on Improving Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Skills.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas LambinGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Pavilion L, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.
Jérôme RivoryGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Pavilion L, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.
Timothée WallenhorstDepartment of Gastroenterology, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Romain LegrosGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Dupuytren university Hospital, Limoges, France.
Frédéric MonzyClinique Claude Bernard, Albi, France.
Jérémie JacquesGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Dupuytren university Hospital, Limoges, France.
Mathieu PiocheGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Pavilion L, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.
Hôpital Edouard Herriot · FRHôpital Dupuytren · FRHôpital Pontchaillou · FRLaboratoire des applications Thérapeutiques des Ultrasons · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRXLIM · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows an "en bloc" resection with safety margins (R0 resection) regardless of the size of the lesion. However, while R0 brings a real benefit for the patient, it is not considered sufficient by many experts to justify the technical difficulties and the longer procedure time compared to piecemeal mucosectomy. The aims of this review are to provide several technical and strategical tips to help you save time and become comfortable during ESD procedures. ESD is divided into several intertwined phases: injection, incision, access to the submucosae, and submucosal dissection itself. During injection there are some mistakes that should not be made: a superficial injection, or on the contrary, a too deep injection. A good needle and good injection technique are mandatory. Some techniques, such as repeated injection or prolonged lifting solution, can help maintain the lift. After this step, mucosal incision can be made, taking care to have a good margin to allow an R0 resection. Starting the mucosal incision from a small point allows calibration of the depth of the incision and then obtaining a nice incision. Trimming is also very important to widen submucosal access. Then comes the submucosal dissection itself. Strategies such as the tunnel strategy or the pocket creation method can help to facilitate dissection, but more importantly, traction systems have become unavoidable, especially in the stomach and colon. Most common complications are bleeding and perforation, and they usually can be managed endoscopically.

Identifiers

PMID34790536
PMCPMC8589544
OpenAlexW3211362480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.