Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34790528›Full record

ReviewEndoscopy international open2021

Efficacy of bowel preparation regimens for colon capsule endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thomas Bjoersum-Meyer, Karolina Skonieczna-Zydecka, Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia, Irene Stenfors, Ivan Lyutakov, Emanuele Rondonotti, Marco Pennazio, Wojciech Marlicz, Gunnar Baatrup, Anastasios Koulaouzidis and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endoscopy international open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Advances in colon capsule endoscopy: a review of current applications and challenges.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  20. Clinical utility of colon capsule endoscopy: a moving target?Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Thomas Bjoersum-MeyerDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense Denmark.
Karolina Skonieczna-ZydeckaDepartment of Biochemical Sciences, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Pablo Cortegoso ValdiviaGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Irene StenforsDepartment of Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Lund University, Sweden.
Ivan LyutakovDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital "Tsaritsa Yoanna - ISUL", Medical University Sofia, Bulgaria.
Emanuele RondonottiGastroenterology Unit, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy.
Marco PennazioUniversity Division of Gastroenterology, City of Health and Science University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Wojciech MarliczDepartment of Gastroenterology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Gunnar BaatrupDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense Denmark.
Anastasios KoulaouzidisDepartment of Social Medicine & Public Health, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Ervin TothDepartment of Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Lund University, Sweden.
Pomeranian Medical University · PLOdense University Hospital · DKSkåne University Hospital · SEOspedale Valduce · ITQueen Giovanna Hospital · BGUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID34790528
PMCPMC8589531
OpenAlexW3212586373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.