Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34790516›Full record

ArticleClinical nephrology. Case studies2021

COVID-19 and renal infarct: To be or not to be on anticoagulation.

Chelsea Takamatsu, Paola Devis, Ramin Tolouian

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical nephrology. Case studies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chelsea TakamatsuDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arizona.
Paola DevisDepartment of Radiology, Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, and.
Ramin TolouianRenal Section, Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
University of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a unique case of a male veteran with a history of Castleman disease, presenting with multiple arterial and venous vascular thromboses in the setting of recent Coronavirus (COVID-19)-disease diagnosis. We explore this patient's morbidity related to thrombotic complications of his COVID-19 diagnosis that were potentially avoidable with a comprehensive outpatient evaluation of his risk for thrombosis, as well as the initiation of anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet therapy given his high risk. Our case highlights the need for a standardized clinical workup of patients in the outpatient setting for risk assessment of vascular thrombosis associated with COVID-19 infection to direct medical management, in order to minimize adverse outcomes, complications requiring inpatient admission, and the need for additional yet limited medical resources and interventions. We propose a minimum of low-dose aspirin 81 mg daily as a reasonable approach for outpatient clinicians to consider, based on their best clinical judgement, when managing mild COVID-19, while other options, such as novel oral anticoagulants, are undergoing further investigation.

Indexed as

anticoagulationarterial thrombiCastleman diseaseCOVID-19pulmonary embolirenal infarctionspleen infarct

Identifiers

PMID34790516
PMCPMC8594313
OpenAlexW3214602486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.