Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34790406›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2021

Resectable, borderline, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer-"the good, the bad, and the ugly" candidates for surgery?

Svein Olav Bratlie, Johanna Wennerblom, Caroline Vilhav, Jan Persson, Elena Rangelova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Advances in Surgical Treatment Following Conversion Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Locally Advanced Pancreas Cancer, Is There a Role for Surgery?The Surgical clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Svein Olav BratlieSection for Upper Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Johanna WennerblomSection for Upper Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Caroline VilhavSection for Upper Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jan PerssonSection for Upper Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Elena RangelovaSection for Upper Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The possibility of surgical resection strongly overrules medical oncologic treatment and is the only modality, causa sine qua non, long-term survival can be achieved in patients with pancreatic cancer. For this reason, the clinical classification of local resectability, subdividing tumors into resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced cancer, that is very technical in nature, is the one most widely used and accepted. As multimodality treatment with potent agents, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, seems to be stepping forward as the new standard of treatment of pancreatic cancer, the established technical surgical landmarks tend to get challenged. This review aims to highlight the grey zones in the current classifications for local tumor involvement with respect to the observed patient outcome in the current multimodality treatment era. It summarizes the latest reported series on the outcome of resected primary resectable, borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer, and particularly vascular resections during pancreatectomy, in the background of different types of neoadjuvant therapy. It also hints what the new horizons of cancer biology tend to reveal whenever the technical hinders start being pushed aside. The current calls for the necessity of re-classification of the clinical categories of pancreatic cancer, from technically oriented to biology-focused individualized approach, are being elucidated.

Indexed as

borderlinelocally advancedPancreatic cancer (PC)resectionsurgery

Identifiers

PMID34790406
PMCPMC8576252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.