Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34790260›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2021

Surgical outcome and prognostic factors in spinal cord ependymoma: a single-center, long-term follow-up study.

Oliver Gembruch, Mehdi Chihi, Merle Haarmann, Ahmet Parlak, Marvin Darkwah Oppong, Laurèl Rauschenbach, Anna Michel, Ramazan Jabbarli, Yahya Ahmadipour, Ulrich Sure and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Outcomes after surgical resection of spinal ependymomas: extent of resection, imaging phenotype, and survival.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Two Central Nervous System Tumors in One Catheter Lab: Time to Rethink Radiation Protection.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  4. Preoperative risk stratification for long-term neurological status in spinal ependymoma: an MRI-centered nomogram.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Prognosis and strategies for reoperation in recurrent spinal tumors: an average 5-Year follow-up retrospective study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Oliver GembruchDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122 Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0054-1611
Mehdi ChihiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Merle HaarmannDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Ahmet ParlakDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Marvin Darkwah OppongDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1021-5024
Laurèl RauschenbachDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Anna MichelDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Ramazan JabbarliDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Yahya AhmadipourDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Ulrich SureDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Philipp DammannDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Neriman ÖzkanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSpinal cord ependymomas account for 3-6% of all central nervous system tumors and around 60% of all intramedullary tumors. The aim of this study was to analyze the neurological outcome after surgery and to determine prognostic factors for functional outcome. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients treated surgically due to a spinal cord ependymoma between 1990 and 2018 were retrospectively included. Demographics, neurological symptoms, radiological parameters, histopathology, and neurological outcome (using McCormick Score [MCS]) were analyzed. Possible prognostic factors for neurological outcome were evaluated.

resultsIn total, 148 patients were included (76 males, 51.4%). The mean age was 46.7 ± 15.3 years. The median follow-up period was 6.8 ± 5.4 years. The prevalence was mostly in the lumbar spine (45.9%), followed by the thoracic spine (28.4%) and cervical spine (25.7%). Gross-total resection was achieved in 129 patients (87.2%). The recurrence rate was 8.1% and depended on the extent of tumor resection (

conclusionNeurological deterioration was seen in the majority of cervical and thoracic spine ependymomas. Postoperative improvement was less in thoracic cervical spine ependymomas compared with thoracic spine ependymomas. Poor preoperative status and especially tumor extension >2 vertebrae are predictors of poor neurological outcome (MCS >2).

Indexed as

neurological outcomeoutcome predictionpredictorsspinal ependymomasurgery

Identifiers

PMID34790260
PMCPMC8591778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.