Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34790232›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2021

Deep Hybrid Convolutional Neural Network for Segmentation of Melanoma Skin Lesion.

Cheng-Hong Yang, Jai-Hong Ren, Hsiu-Chen Huang, Li-Yeh Chuang, Po-Yin Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cheng-Hong YangDepartment of Electronic Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 80778, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2741-0072
Jai-Hong RenDepartment of Electronic Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 80778, Taiwan.
Hsiu-Chen HuangDepartment of Community Health Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Physician, Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi City 60002, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3624-3314
Li-Yeh ChuangDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Institute of Biotechnology and Chemical Engineering, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 84001, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9817-5102
Po-Yin ChangDepartment of Electronic Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 80778, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0045-5139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanoma is a type of skin cancer that often leads to poor prognostic responses and survival rates. Melanoma usually develops in the limbs, including in fingers, palms, and the margins of the nails. When melanoma is detected early, surgical treatment may achieve a higher cure rate. The early diagnosis of melanoma depends on the manual segmentation of suspected lesions. However, manual segmentation can lead to problems, including misclassification and low efficiency. Therefore, it is essential to devise a method for automatic image segmentation that overcomes the aforementioned issues. In this study, an improved algorithm is proposed, termed EfficientUNet++, which is developed from the U-Net model. In EfficientUNet++, the pretrained EfficientNet model is added to the UNet++ model to accelerate segmentation process, leading to more reliable and precise results in skin cancer image segmentation. Two skin lesion datasets were used to compare the performance of the proposed EfficientUNet++ algorithm with other common models. In the PH2 dataset, EfficientUNet++ achieved a better Dice coefficient (93% vs. 76%-91%), Intersection over Union (IoU, 96% vs. 74%-95%), and loss value (30% vs. 44%-32%) compared with other models. In the International Skin Imaging Collaboration dataset, EfficientUNet++ obtained a similar Dice coefficient (96% vs. 94%-96%) but a better IoU (94% vs. 89%-93%) and loss value (11% vs. 13%-11%) than other models. In conclusion, the EfficientUNet++ model efficiently detects skin lesions by improving composite coefficients and structurally expanding the size of the convolution network. Moreover, the use of residual units deepens the network to further improve performance.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin DiseasesSkin NeoplasmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID34790232
PMCPMC8592765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.