Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34790213›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Flowering Times of Wild

Hannah Kinmonth-Schultz, Anna Lewandowska-Sabat, Takato Imaizumi, Joy K Ward, Odd Arne Rognli, Siri Fjellheim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Differences in the Gene Regulatory Network for Floral Induction in TwoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The maternal embrace: the protection of plant embryos.Journal of experimental botany · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Exploring the Regulatory Dynamics ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Two alternative splicing variants of a wheat geneFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hannah Kinmonth-SchultzDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.
Anna Lewandowska-SabatResearch Support Office, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Takato ImaizumiDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Joy K WardCollege of Arts and Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Odd Arne RognliFaculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Siri FjellheimFaculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.

Funding

U of Kansas/Haskell Indian Nations U.IRACDA ProjectK12GM063651 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI DE GUZMAN, ROBERTO N · 2002 to 2022
$10.0M
Molecular Mechanisms of Seasonal Time MeasurementR01GM079712 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI IMAIZUMI, TAKATO · 2007 to 2022
$3.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM063651NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temperate species often require or flower most rapidly in the long daylengths, or photoperiods, experienced in summer or after prolonged periods of cold temperatures, referred to as vernalization. Yet, even within species, plants vary in the degree of responsiveness to these cues. In

Indexed as

Arabidopsis thalianaCONSTANS (CO)FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC)FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT)flowering timenatural variation

Identifiers

PMID34790213
PMCPMC8591261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.