ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2021
Neuropsychological Research in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Current Status and Future Directions.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Cognitive Functions in Patients with Autogenous and Reactive Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Enhancing readiness for exposure and response prevention in obsessive compulsive disorder: ketogenic metabolic therapy as a candidate readiness adjunct.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Executive Function and Emotion Regulation in Depressive and Anxiety Disorders: A Cross-sectional Study.Indian journal of psychological medicine · 2025Article
- A case study on using quantile regression in psychiatry research.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Externally orienting cues improve cognitive control in OCD.Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry · 2024Article
- Atypical neurocognitive functioning in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2024Article
- Cognitive Training in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Systematic Review.Indian journal of psychological medicine · 2024Review
- Manipulating levels of uncertainty in a decision-making task for obsessive compulsive disorder.Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999) · 2024Article
- Abnormalities of Hippocampal Subfield and Amygdalar Nuclei Volumes and Clinical Correlates in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia with Obsessive-Compulsive Behavior-A Pilot Study.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Role of Cognitive Control in Psychotherapy: An Integrated Review.Indian journal of psychological medicine · 2023Article
- High treatment resistance is associated with lower performance in the Stroop test in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- An fMRI study of cognitive planning before and after symptom provocation in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPNArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuropsychological functions in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have been extensively investigated. Despite some common findings across studies indicating deficient test performance across cognitive domains with small to medium effect sizes, results remain inconsistent and heterogeneous. However, multiple past attempts to identify moderators that may account for such variability have been unrewarding. Typical moderators including symptom severity, age at onset, medication status, and comorbid conditions failed to provide sufficient explanatory power. It has then been posited that these inconsistencies may be attributed to the inherent heterogeneous nature of the disorder (i.e., symptom dimensions), or to the natural fluctuation in symptom severity. However, recent meta-analyses suggest that these factors may not account for the persistent unexplained variability. Other potential factors-some of which are unique to neuropsychological testing-received scarce research attention, including definition of cognitive impairments, specificity and selection of test and outcome measures, and their limited ecological validity. Other moderators, particularly motivational aspects, and metacognitive factors (e.g., self-efficacy) were not previously addressed despite their potential association to OCD, and their documented impact on cognitive function. The aim of the present mini-review is to provide an updated succinct overview of the current status of the neuropsychological literature in OCD and expanding upon oft-neglected potential moderators and their putative impact on neuropsychological findings in OCD. Our goal is to highlight important avenues for further research and provide a road map for investigators in order to advance our understanding of cognitive functions in OCD that has been stagnant in the past decade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.