Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34790004›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2021

Hepatocellular carcinoma risk after viral response in hepatitis C virus-advanced fibrosis: Who to screen and for how long?

Adriana Ahumada, Laura Rayón, Clara Usón, Rafael Bañares, Sonia Alonso Lopez

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Chronic Viral Hepatitis: Where Do We Stand?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adriana AhumadaLiver Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid 28007, Spain.
Laura RayónLiver Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid 28007, Spain.
Clara UsónLiver Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid 28007, Spain.
Rafael BañaresLiver Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid 28007, Spain.
Sonia Alonso LopezLiver Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid 28007, Spain.
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) chronic infection is associated with fibrosis progression, end-stage liver complications and HCC. Not surprisingly, HCV infection is a leading cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. After sustained virological response (SVR), the risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma is not completely eliminated in patients with established cirrhosis or with advanced fibrosis. Therefore, lifelong surveillance is currently recommended. This strategy is likely not universally cost-effective and harmless, considering that not all patients with advanced fibrosis have the same risk of developing HCC. Factors related to the severity of liver disease and its potential to improve after SVR, the molecular and epigenetic changes that occur during infection and other associated comorbidities might account for different risk levels and are likely essential for identifying patients who would benefit from screening programs after SVR. Efforts to develop predictive models and risk calculators, biomarkers and genetic panels and even deep learning models to estimate the individual risk of HCC have been made in the direct-acting antiviral agents era, when thousands of patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis have reached SVR. These tools could help to identify patients with very low HCC risk in whom surveillance might not be justified. In this review, factors affecting the probability of HCC development after SVR, the benefits and risks of surveillance, suggested strategies to estimate individualized HCC risk and the current evidence to recommend lifelong surveillance are discussed.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularHepatitis CHepatitis C, ChronicLiver NeoplasmsAntiviral AgentsHepacivirusHumansLiver CirrhosisRisk FactorsSustained Virologic ResponseAntiviral AgentsCost-effectivenessEpigenetic changesHepatitis C virusHepatocellular carcinomaLiver fibrosisPredictive modelsSurveillanceSustained virologic response

Identifiers

PMID34790004
PMCPMC8567476
OpenAlexW3211084017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.