Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34789551›Full record

Observational studyJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2021

Efficacy and safety of vedolizumab and infliximab treatment for immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis in patients with cancer: a two-center observational study.

Fangwen Zou, David Faleck, Anusha Thomas, Jessica Harris, Deepika Satish, Xuemei Wang, Aline Charabaty, Marc S Ernstoff, Isabella C Glitza Oliva, Stephen Hanauer and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. The Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Journey: From Early Promise to Lasting Impact.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Upadacitinib Achieved Rapid Response in Biologic-Refractory Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Enterocolitis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Fangwen ZouDepartment of Oncology, Second Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China.
David FaleckDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Anusha ThomasDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jessica HarrisDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Deepika SatishDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Xuemei WangDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Aline CharabatyDepartment of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC, USA.
Marc S ErnstoffDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8132-7069
Isabella C Glitza OlivaDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4530-7765
Stephen HanauerDepartment of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Jennifer McQuadeDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Michel ObeidDepartment of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2095-2677
Amishi ShahDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
David M RichardsDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Elad SharonDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0044-9719
Jedd WolchokHuman Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
John ThompsonUniversity of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Yinghong WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA YWang59@mdanderson.org.ORCID 0000-0002-5148-6130
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNational Cancer Institute · USJohns Hopkins University · USNorthwestern University · USSeattle Cancer Care Alliance · USUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent treatment guidelines for immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis (IMDC) recommend steroids as first-line therapy, followed by selective immunosuppressive therapy (SIT) (infliximab or vedolizumab) for refractory cases. We aimed to compare the efficacy of these two SITs and their impact on cancer outcomes.

methodsWe performed a two-center, retrospective observational cohort study of patients with IMDC who received SITs following steroids from 2016 to 2020. Patients' demographic, clinical, and overall survival data were collected and analyzed.

resultsA total of 184 patients (62 vedolizumab, 94 infliximab, 28 combined sequentially) were included. The efficacy of achieving clinical remission of IMDC was similar (89% vs 88%, p=0.79) between the two groups. Compared with the infliximab group, the vedolizumab group had a shorter steroid exposure (35 vs 50 days, p<0.001), fewer hospitalizations (16% vs 28%, p=0.005), and a shorter hospital stay (median 10.5 vs 13.5 days, p=0.043), but a longer time to clinical response (17.5 vs 13 days, p=0.012). Longer durations of immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment (OR 1.01, p=0.004) and steroid use (OR 1.02, p=0.043), and infliximab use alone (OR 2.51, p=0.039) were associated with higher IMDC recurrence. Furthermore, ≥3 doses of SIT (p=0.011), and fewer steroid tapering attempts (p=0.012) were associated with favorable overall survival.

conclusionsTreatment with vedolizumab as compared with infliximab for IMDC led to comparable IMDC response rates, shorter duration of steroid use, fewer hospitalizations, and lower IMDC recurrence, though with slightly longer time to IMDC response. Higher number of SIT doses was associated with better survival outcome, while more steroid exposure resulted in worse patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsColitisDiarrheaFemaleHumansInfliximabMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedInfliximabvedolizumabcytotoxicityimmunologicimmunotherapyinflammationmelanoma

Identifiers

PMID34789551
PMCPMC8601082
OpenAlexW3213661854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.