Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34789472›Full record

ArticleBMJ open gastroenterology2021

Prediction of in-hospital mortality of

Hao Du, Kewin Tien Ho Siah, Valencia Zhang Ru-Yan, Readon Teh, Christopher Yu En Tan, Wesley Yeung, Christina Scaduto, Sarah Bolongaita, Maria Teresa Kasunuran Cruz, Mengru Liu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Oral Vancomycin in the Treatment ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. The Global Burden ofInfectious disease reports · 2025
    Review
  3. Optimal and Safe Estimation for High-Dimensional Semi-Supervised Learning.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2024
    Article
  4. Open forum infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hao Du *Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-5083-8122
Kewin Tien Ho Siah *Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore kewin_siah@nuhs.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0002-2795-5101
Valencia Zhang Ru-YanUniversity Medicine Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Readon TehUniversity Medicine Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4230-063X
Christopher Yu En TanDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Wesley YeungUniversity Medicine Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Christina ScadutoDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sarah BolongaitaDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Maria Teresa Kasunuran CruzUniversity Medicine Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Mengru LiuSchool of Computing and Information Systems, Singapore Management University, Singapore.
Xiaohao LinMachine Intellection Department, Institute for Infocomm Research, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore.
Yan Yuan TanAlliance Healthcare Group, Singapore.
Mengling FengSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
National University Hospital · SGNational University of Singapore · SGHarvard Global Health Institute · USAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGSingapore Management University · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RESEARCH

objectivesMETHODOLOGY: The demographics, clinical parameters, laboratory results and mortality of CDI were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III (MIMIC-III) database. We subsequently trained three machine learning models: logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF) and gradient boosting machine (GBM) to predict in-hospital mortality. The individual performances of the models were compared against current severity scores (Clostridiodes difficile Associated Risk of Death Score (CARDS) and ATLAS (Age, Treatment with systemic antibiotics, leukocyte count, Albumin and Serum creatinine as a measure of renal function) by calculating area under receiver operating curve (AUROC). We identified factors associated with higher mortality risk in each model. SUMMARY OF

resultsFrom 61 532 intensive care unit stays in the MIMIC-III database, there were 1315 CDI cases. The mortality rate for CDI in the study cohort was 18.33%. AUROC was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.76) for LR, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.77) for RF and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.78) for GBM, while previously AUROC was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.65) for CARDS and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.70) for ATLAS. Albumin, lactate and bicarbonate were significant mortality factors for all the models. Free calcium, potassium, white blood cell, urea, platelet and mean blood pressure were present in at least two of the three models.

conclusionOur machine learning derived CDI in-hospital mortality prediction model identified pertinent factors that can assist critical care clinicians in identifying patients at high risk of dying from CDI.

Indexed as

Big DataCritical CareAlbuminsHospital MortalityHumansMachine LearningAlbuminsbacterial infectiondiarrhoeadietary - gastrointestinal infections

Identifiers

PMID34789472
PMCPMC8601086
OpenAlexW3213137502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.