Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34789356›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2022

Associations between farmers' market shopping behaviours and objectively measured and self-reported fruit and vegetable intake in a diverse sample of farmers' market shoppers: a cross-sectional study in New York City and rural North Carolina.

Casey J Kelley, Karla L Hanson, Grace A Marshall, Leah C Volpe, Stephanie Jilcott Pitts, Ann P Rafferty, Rebecca A Seguin-Fowler

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Casey J KelleyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Center for Aging and Health, 5003 Old Clinic CB#7550, Chapel Hill, NC27599, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7770-1639
Karla L HansonCornell University, Master of Public Health Program, Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Grace A MarshallCornell University, Master of Public Health Program, Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4174-5765
Leah C VolpeCornell University, Master of Public Health Program, Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Stephanie Jilcott PittsEast Carolina University, Brody School of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Greenville, NC, USA.
Ann P RaffertyEast Carolina University, Brody School of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Greenville, NC, USA.
Rebecca A Seguin-FowlerTexas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5115-2341
Cornell University · USEast Carolina University · USTexas A&M University System · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine cross-sectional associations between farmers' market shopping behaviours and objectively measured and self-reported fruit and vegetable (FV) intake among rural North Carolina (NC) and New York City (NYC) shoppers.

designCross-sectional intercept surveys were used to assess self-reported FV intake and three measures of farmers' market shopping behaviour: (1) frequency of purchasing FV; (2) variety of FV purchased and (3) dollars spent on FV. Skin carotenoids, a non-invasive biomarker for FV intake, were objectively measured using pressure-mediated reflection spectroscopy. Associations between farmers' market shopping behaviours and FV intake were examined using regression models that controlled for demographic variables (e.g. age, sex, race, smoking status, education, income and state).

settingFarmers' markets (n 17 markets) in rural NC and NYC.

participantsA convenience sample of 645 farmers' market shoppers.

resultsFarmers' market shoppers in NYC purchased a greater variety of FV and had higher skin carotenoid scores compared with shoppers in rural NC. Among all shoppers, there was a positive, statistically significant association between self-reported frequency of shopping at farmers' markets and self-reported as well as objectively assessed FV intake. The variety of FV purchased and farmers' market spending on FV also were positively associated with self-reported FV intake, but not skin carotenoids.

conclusionThose who shop for FV more frequently at a farmers' markets, purchase a greater variety of FV and spend more money on FV have higher self-reported, and in some cases higher objectively measured FV intake. Further research is needed to understand these associations and test causality.

Indexed as

FarmersVegetablesCarotenoidsCross-Sectional StudiesDietFood SupplyFruitHumansNew York CityNorth CarolinaSelf ReportCarotenoidsFarmers’ marketsFruit and vegetable intakeShopping behavioursSkin carotenoids

Identifiers

PMID34789356
PMCPMC9991615
OpenAlexW3211555489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.