Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34789334›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2021

ReIMAGINE: a prostate cancer research consortium with added value through its patient and public involvement and engagement.

S Green, S Tuck, J Long, T Green, A Green, P Ellis, A Haire, C Moss, F Cahill, N McCartan and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

S GreenTranslational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
S Tuck *ReIMAGINE Consortium Patient Representative, London, UK.
J Long *ReIMAGINE Consortium Patient Representative, London, UK.
T Green *ReIMAGINE Consortium Patient Representative, London, UK.
A Green *ReIMAGINE Consortium Patient Representative, London, UK.
P Ellis *ReIMAGINE Consortium Patient Representative, London, UK.
A HaireTranslational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
C MossTranslational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
F CahillTranslational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
N McCartanUCL Division of Surgical and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
L BrownMRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.
A SantaolallaTranslational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
T MarsdenUCL Division of Surgical and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
M Rodriquez JustoUCL Division of Surgical and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
J HadleyUCL Division of Surgical and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
S PunwaniCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
G AttardUCL Division of Surgical and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
H AhmedImperial College, London, UK.
C M MooreUCL Division of Surgical and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
M EmbertonUCL Division of Surgical and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
M Van HemelrijckTranslational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK. mieke.vanhemelrijck@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7317-0858
King's College London · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBImperial College London · GBMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004/01Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004/02Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/28Medical Research Council MR/R014043/1Medical Research Council (GB) MR/R014043/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReIMAGINE aims to improve the current prostate specific antigen (PSA)/biopsy risk stratification for prostate cancer (PCa) and develop a new image-based method (with biomarkers) for diagnosing high/low risk PCa in men. ReIMAGINE's varied patient and public involvement (PPI) and engagement (PE) strategy maximises the impact of its scientific output by informing and shaping the different stages of research.

aimsThrough including the voice of patients and the public, the ReIMAGINE Consortium aims to translate these different perspectives into the design and implementation process. This will improve the overall quality of the research by: reflecting the needs and priorities of patients and the public, ensuring methods and procedures are feasible and appropriate ensuring information is relevant and accessible to those being recruited to the study identifying dissemination channels relevant to patients/the public and developing outputs that are accessible to a lay audience With support from our patient/user groups, the ReIMAGINE Consortium aims to improve our ability to derive prognostic information and allocate men to the most appropriate and effective therapies, using a novel image-based risk stratification with investigation of non-imaging biomarkers.

findingsWe have been working with patients and the public from initiation of the project to ensure that the research is relevant to men and their families. Our PPI Sub-Committee, led by a PCa patient, has been involved in our dissemination strategy, outreach activities, and study design recommendations. For example, the sub-committee have developed a variety of informative videos relevant and accessible to those being recruited, and organised multiple online research engagement events that are accessible to a lay audience. As quoted by one of the study participants, "the more we present the benefits and opportunities to patients and the public, the more research commitment we obtain, and the sooner critical clinical questions such as PCa diagnostics will be addressed".

Indexed as

CancerPatient and public engagementPatient and public involvementProstate cancerStudy design

Identifiers

PMID34789334
PMCPMC8596340
OpenAlexW3211865196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.