Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34789329›Full record

ArticleBMC nutrition2021

The nutriRECIPE-Index - development and validation of a nutrient-weighted index for the evaluation of recipes.

Frank Forner, Ina Volkhardt, Toni Meier, Olaf Christen, Gabriele I Stangl

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Analysis of the Provision of Plant-Based, Vegetarian and Omnivorous Meals in UK Care Homes for Older People.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Frank FornerMartin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute for Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Halle, Germany. frank.forner@onlinehome.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8262-0224
Ina VolkhardtMartin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute for Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Halle, Germany.
Toni MeierMartin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute for Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Halle, Germany.
Olaf ChristenMartin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute for Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Halle, Germany.
Gabriele I StanglMartin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute for Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Halle, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01EA1411C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur objective was to develop a nutrient-based index for evaluating and improving menus in public catering. The nutriRECIPE-Index comprises 24 nutrients and nutrient groups. In developing the index, the following steps were included: setting the goals of the index, nutrient selection, target metrics and scaling, weighting, proof of concept and validation of the index. Furthermore, a unique database was created to integrate bioactive plant compounds in the assessment. An assessment of standard recipes and supposedly healthy recipes should show a significant difference in the results of the nutriRECIPE-Index. Finally, the nutriRECIPE-Index should generate similar or more specific results than existing indices such as the Nutri-Score and the Healthy Meal Index.

methodsA whole meal cycle (comprising 6 weeks, 106 recipes and including different menu lines, partially with different side dishes) at a university canteen was analysed with the Federal Food Code (BLS) and the nutriRECIPE-Index. The Healthy Meal Index (comprising 3 nutritionally relevant items) and the Nutri-Score algorithm (comprising 7 items) were used to validate the nutrient composition and the results of the nutriRECIPE-Index.

resultsThe resulting scores of the recipes and menu lines showed substantial differences, wherein the meals of a health-promoting menu line usually received higher scores than the standard recipes. A correlation between the nutriRECIPE-Index and the Healthy Meal Index (0.604) and the Nutri-Score (0.591) was observed. The nutriRECIPE-Index was better at identifying the worst menus and could better separate mediocre menus from good menus.

conclusionThe nutriRECIPE-Index is a useful and comprehensive tool for evaluating the nutritional value of recipes and is the first to consider bioactive plant compounds. Further adjustments to different target populations, settings, and cultural backgrounds are possible.

Indexed as

Diet qualityHealthy meal indexNutri-scorePublic cateringPublic health nutrition

Identifiers

PMID34789329
PMCPMC8600763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.