Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34788652›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular surgery2022

Contemporary management of acute and chronic mesenteric ischemia: 10-year experience from a multihospital healthcare system.

Elizabeth A Andraska, Lillian M Tran, Lindsey M Haga, Allison K Mak, Michael C Madigan, Michel S Makaroun, Mohammad H Eslami, Rabih A Chaer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Outcomes after open and endovascular treatment for mesenteric artery embolism patients: a retrospective inverse probability of treatment-weighted analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Revisiting abdominal closure in mesenteric ischemia: is there an association with outcome?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  10. Retrograde superior mesenteric artery stenting via jejunal arterial access-how I do it.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2023
    Article
  11. Intravascular lithotripsy for the treatment of inferior mesenteric artery in-stent restenosis.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth A AndraskaDepartment of Surgery, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa. Electronic address: andraskaea@upmc.edu.
Lillian M TranDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Lindsey M HagaDepartment of Surgery, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Allison K MakUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Michael C MadiganDepartment of Surgery, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Michel S MakarounDepartment of Surgery, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Mohammad H EslamiDepartment of Surgery, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Rabih A ChaerDepartment of Surgery, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Vascular Surgery Research Training (VascTrain) ProgramT32HL098036 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Edith Tzeng · 2010 to 2026
$7.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEndovascular and hybrid methods have been increasingly used to treat mesenteric ischemia. However, the long-term outcomes and risk of symptom recurrence remain unknown. The objective of the present study was to define the predictors of postoperative morbidity, mortality, and patency loss for acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) and chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI).

methodsThe inpatient and follow-up records for all patients who had undergone revascularization for AMI and CMI from 2010 to 2020 at a multicenter hospital system were reviewed. Patency and mortality were evaluated with Cox regression, visualized with Kaplan-Meier curves, and compared using log-rank testing. Patency was further evaluated using Fine-Gray regression with death as a competing risk. The postoperative major adverse events (MAE) and 30-day mortality were evaluated with logistic regression.

resultsA total of 407 patients were included, 148 with AMI and 259 with CMI. For the AMI group, the 30-day mortality was 31%. Open surgery was associated with lower rates of bowel resection (odds ratio [OR], 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.61). The etiology of AMI also did not change the outcomes (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.77-2.19). Adjusted analyses indicated that a history of diabetes (OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.37-5.61) and sepsis on presentation (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.18-4.58) were independently associated with an increased risk of 30-day MAE. In the CMI group, open surgery and chronic kidney disease were associated with a higher incidence of MAE (OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.14-8.05; OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.31-4.31). In contrast, chronic kidney disease (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.10-8.37) and inpatient status before revascularization (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.01-7.61) were associated with increased 30-day mortality. For the CMI group, the endovascular cohort had experienced greater rates of symptom recurrence (29% vs 13%) with a faster onset (endovascular, 64 days; vs bypass, 338 days).

conclusionsAMI remains a morbid disease despite the evolving revascularization techniques. An open approach should remain the reference standard because it reduces the likelihood of bowel resection. For CMI, endovascular interventions have improved the postoperative morbidity but have also resulted in early symptom recurrence and reintervention. An endovascular-first approach should be the standard of care for CMI with close surveillance.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresMesenteric IschemiaMesenteric Vascular OcclusionRenal Insufficiency, ChronicChronic DiseaseDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansIschemiaMaleRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVascular PatencyMesenteric bypassMesenteric ischemiaMesenteric stentingRetrograde open mesenteric stenting

Identifiers

PMID34788652
PMCPMC9038632
OpenAlexW3211591251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.