Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34788504›Full record

ArticleJournal of integrative bioinformatics2021

Sahar Qazi, Khalid Raza

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of integrative bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sahar QaziDepartment of Computer Science, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India.
Khalid RazaDepartment of Computer Science, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3646-6828
Jamia Millia Islamia · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in India. Epigenetics mechanisms seemingly plays an important role in ovarian cancer. This paper highlights the crucial epigenetic changes that occur in POTEE that get hypomethylated in ovarian cancer. We utilized the POTEE paralog mRNA sequence to identify major motifs and also performed its enrichment analysis. We identified 6 motifs of varying lengths, out of which only three motifs, including CTTCCAGCAGATGTGGATCA, GGAACTGCC, and CGCCACATGCAGGC were most likely to be present in the nucleotide sequence of POTEE. By enrichment and occurrences identification analyses, we rectified the best match motif as CTTCCAGCAGATGT. Since there is no experimentally verified structure of POTEE paralog, thus, we predicted the POTEE structure using an automated workflow for template-based modeling using the power of a deep neural network. Additionally, to validate our predicted model we used AlphaFold predicted POTEE structure and observed that the residual stretch starting from 237-958 had a very high confidence per residue. Furthermore, POTEE predicted model stability was evaluated using replica exchange molecular dynamic simulation for 50 ns. Our network-based epigenetic analysis discerns only 10 highly significant, direct, and physical associators of POTEE. Our finding aims to provide new insights about the POTEE paralog.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmOvarian NeoplasmsEpigenesis, GeneticHumansAntigens, Neoplasmdeep neural networkMD simulationnetwork-based epigeneticsovarian cancerPOTEEtemplate-based modeling

Identifiers

PMID34788504
PMCPMC8709732
OpenAlexW3213241343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.