ArticleJournal of integrative bioinformatics2021
Article in Journal of integrative bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in detection of ovarian cancer-a pilot study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Gut-Vaginal Microbiome Crosstalk in Ovarian Cancer: Implications for Early Diagnosis.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- In silico enhancer mining reveals SNS-032 and EHMT2 inhibitors as therapeutic candidates in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.British journal of cancer · 2023Article
- Special Issue of the 1st International Applied Bioinformatics Conference (iABC'21).Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in India. Epigenetics mechanisms seemingly plays an important role in ovarian cancer. This paper highlights the crucial epigenetic changes that occur in POTEE that get hypomethylated in ovarian cancer. We utilized the POTEE paralog mRNA sequence to identify major motifs and also performed its enrichment analysis. We identified 6 motifs of varying lengths, out of which only three motifs, including CTTCCAGCAGATGTGGATCA, GGAACTGCC, and CGCCACATGCAGGC were most likely to be present in the nucleotide sequence of POTEE. By enrichment and occurrences identification analyses, we rectified the best match motif as CTTCCAGCAGATGT. Since there is no experimentally verified structure of POTEE paralog, thus, we predicted the POTEE structure using an automated workflow for template-based modeling using the power of a deep neural network. Additionally, to validate our predicted model we used AlphaFold predicted POTEE structure and observed that the residual stretch starting from 237-958 had a very high confidence per residue. Furthermore, POTEE predicted model stability was evaluated using replica exchange molecular dynamic simulation for 50 ns. Our network-based epigenetic analysis discerns only 10 highly significant, direct, and physical associators of POTEE. Our finding aims to provide new insights about the POTEE paralog.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.