Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34788358›Full record

ArticleAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2022

How is the Behavior Change Technique Content of the NHS Diabetes Prevention Program Understood by Participants? A Qualitative Study of Fidelity, With a Focus on Receipt.

Lisa M Miles, Rhiannon E Hawkes, David P French

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Preventing type 2 diabetes: A research agenda for behavioural science.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisa M MilesManchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8971-125X
Rhiannon E HawkesManchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.
David P FrenchManchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7663-7804

Funding

Department of Health 16/48/07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe National Health Service (NHS) Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) is a nationally implemented behavioral intervention for adults at high risk of developing Type 2 diabetes in England, based on a program specification that stipulates inclusion of 19 specific behavior change techniques (BCTs). Previous work has identified drift in fidelity from these NHS England specifications through providers' program manuals, training, and delivery, especially in relation to BCTs targeting self-regulatory processes. PURPOSE: This qualitative study investigates intervention receipt, i.e., how the self-regulatory BCT content of the NHS-DPP is understood by participants.

methodsTwenty participants from eight NHS-DPP locations were interviewed; topics included participants' understanding of self-monitoring of behavior, goal setting, feedback, problem solving, and action planning. Transcripts were analyzed thematically using the framework method.

resultsThere was a wide variation in understanding among participants for some BCTs, as well as between BCTs. Participants described their understanding of "self-monitoring of behaviors" with ease and valued BCTs focused on outcomes (weight loss). Some participants learned how to set appropriate behavioral goals. Participants struggled to recall "action planning" or "problem solving" or found these techniques challenging to understand, unless additional support was provided (e.g., through group discussion).

conclusionsParticipants' lack of understanding of some self-regulatory BCTs is consistent with the drift across fidelity domains previously identified from NHS design specifications. Behavioral interventions should build-in necessary support for participants to help them understand some BCTs such as action planning and problem solving. Alternatively, these self-regulatory BCTs may be intrinsically difficult to use for this population.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2State MedicineAdultBehavior TherapyHumansQualitative ResearchResearch DesignBehavior change techniqueDiabetesFidelityInterventionPreventionReceipt

Identifiers

PMID34788358
PMCPMC9274983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.