ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2022
Few UK vascular centres offer a fully NICE-compliant supervised exercise programme: a national audit.
Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intermittent claudication services in England: insights from a freedom of information request.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTo determine the current (pre-COVID-19) provision of supervised exercise training (SET) for patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in UK Vascular Centres.
methodsHospital Trusts delivering vascular care to patients with PAD were identified from the National Vascular Registry and asked to complete an online questionnaire on their provisions for SET. If a centre offered SET, they were asked questions to determine whether the programme was compliant with NICE guidelines and the difficulties they faced delivering the service. If centres did not offer SET, they were asked what obstacles prevented them implement SET.
resultsOf the 78 UK vascular centres, 59 (76%) responded and were included in the audit. Of these, 27 (46%) were able to offer SET but only 21 (36%) could offer it to all their patients with PAD. Only four (6.8%) offered SET that was fully compliant with current NICE guidelines. Reasons identified included insufficient funding, lack of resource and poor patient compliance.
conclusionsThe benefits of SET are well established yet the availability of the service in the UK is poor. The reasons for this are readily identified but have not yet been overcome. Research on novel methods of delivering supervised exercise that mitigates existing barriers, such as home exercise with remote monitoring, should be prioritised to facilitate optimal management for our patients with PAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.