Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34787815›Full record

ArticleDermatology and therapy2022

Re-Evaluating Limitations in Atopic Dermatitis Meta-Analysis Is Important in Interpreting its Results : Limitations of Atopic Dermatitis meta-analysis.

Efstratios Vakirlis, Aikaterini Tsentemeidou, Stamatios Gregoriou

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Efstratios VakirlisFirst Department of Dermatology and Venereology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University, 124 Delfon str, 54643, Thessaloníki, Greece. svakirlis@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8814-3561
Aikaterini TsentemeidouFirst Department of Dermatology and Venereology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University, 124 Delfon str, 54643, Thessaloníki, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8470-0682
Stamatios Gregoriou1st Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, Andreas Sygros Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7585-1032
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recently published systematic review and meta-analysis concludes that topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) used in atopic dermatitis (AD) increase risk of lymphoma. We believe this study has weaknesses that have not been adequately addressed by the authors and its results must therefore be interpreted with caution. According to study results only pimecrolimus used for AD was statistically significantly associated with lymphoma, and not TCIs in general. Unclear participant baseline immunocompetence and short follow-up duration limit the study's ability to detect malignancy risk. AD has been linked to an increased risk of lymphoma; however, cutaneous lymphoma can be misdiagnosed as AD, which makes it possible that the disease itself rather than treatment with TCIs could account for any increased likelihood of lymphoma in these patients. It is important that clinicians not be wrongfully made more reserved and insecure about prescribing TCIs in the future.

Indexed as

Atopic dermatitisLymphomaPimecrolimusTacrolimusTopical calcineurin inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34787815
PMCPMC8776924
OpenAlexW3212468923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.