Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34787779›Full record

ArticleBulletin of experimental biology and medicine2021

Analysis of Healing of Rat Uterine Wall After Full-Thickness Surgical Incision.

N B Tikhonova, A P Milovanov, V V Aleksankina, T V Fokina, M N Boltovskaya, A P Aleksankin, K A Artem'eva

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N B TikhonovaResearch Institute of Human Morphology, Moscow, Russia. reprod_pathol@morfolhum.ru.
A P MilovanovResearch Institute of Human Morphology, Moscow, Russia.
V V AleksankinaResearch Institute of Human Morphology, Moscow, Russia.
T V FokinaResearch Institute of Human Morphology, Moscow, Russia.
M N BoltovskayaResearch Institute of Human Morphology, Moscow, Russia.
A P AleksankinResearch Institute of Human Morphology, Moscow, Russia.
K A Artem'evaResearch Institute of Human Morphology, Moscow, Russia.
Research Institute of Human Morphology · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We studied the dynamics of morphological changes in the operated segment of the uterine horn of Sprague-Dawley rats during the first 2 weeks of the wound-healing process after a full-thickness surgical incision with regard to the estrous cycle phase. Morphometric parameters of injured uterine right horn were compared with those in the intact left horn of the same animal as a control of changes determined by the hormonal background. It was found that the uterine epithelium in the focus of injury was restored as soon as on day 2 after surgery under the influence of estrous cycle hormones. By day 4, the wound space was completely filled with the endometrial tissue on the side of the uterine lumen and coved by the attached adipose tissue of the mesentery on the side of the abdominal cavity. The thickness of the uterine wall and the uterine lumen differed most strongly between the operated and intact uterine horns during the first 3 days and on day 6 after surgery. The size of the healing area increased during the first three days and reached the peak value by day 3, but then decreased to minimum by day 6.

Indexed as

AnimalsEndometriumEpitheliumEstrous CycleFemaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySurgical WoundUterusWound Healingexperimental modelhysterotomyrepairuterine wall

Identifiers

PMID34787779
OpenAlexW3212905650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.