Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34787741›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2022

Standardization of normal values for cardiac chamber size in echocardiography.

Tatsuya Miyoshi, Hidekazu Tanaka

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Echocardiographic evaluation of the right atrial size and function: Relevance for clinical practice.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tatsuya MiyoshiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osakasayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan. tmiyoshi@med.kindai.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0597-1776
Hidekazu TanakaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Kindai University · JPKobe University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Echocardiography is used worldwide to evaluate cardiac size and function. To determine what values are abnormal, it is essential to establish normal reference values for echocardiography. The current guidelines for chamber quantification specify normative values for cardiac chambers and recommend that gender and body size be taken into account. However, these normative data were established using databases for which a variety of measurement methods were used and the majority of subjects consisted of Whites in Europe and the United States. However, several regional studies from other countries suggest that cardiac size varies globally. To overcome these limitations, the Normal Reference Ranges for Echocardiography study and the World Alliance of Societies of Echocardiography Normal Values study have recently been conducted to examine similarities and differences in cardiac chamber size and to establish normal reference values while taking worldwide diversity into account. The results from these studies have demonstrated that standardization of normal reference values for cardiac size is important. This review article aims to summarize the current status of normative echocardiographic values for cardiac chamber size.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyHeartHeart VentriclesHumansReference StandardsReference ValuesCardiac sizeEchocardiographyNormal reference valuesStandardization

Identifiers

PMID34787741
OpenAlexW3213374202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.