ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2022
Prognosis for Poorly Differentiated, High-Grade Rectal Neuroendocrine Carcinomas.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anal canal neoplasms in the modern era: integrating HPV biology, LAST terminology, and evolving molecular classification.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Rectal neuroendocrine tumors: Update.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Review
- Critical considerations for the management of gastrointestinal mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms and pure neuroendocrine carcinomas.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram to predict overall survival of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: a SEER database analysis.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- Successful outcome achieved with adjuvant chemotherapy with irinotecan plus cisplatin in rectal neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report.Surgical case reports · 2024Article
- When is neoadjuvant chemotherapy indicated in rectal neuroendocrine tumors? An analysis of the National Cancer Database.Techniques in coloproctology · 2024Article
- Review
- Molecular typing and mutational characterization of rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Targeted radionuclide therapy in endocrine-related cancers: advances in the last decade.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Molecular factors, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal tract neuroendocrine tumors: An update.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRectal neuroendocrine carcinomas (rNECs) are poorly characterized and, given their aggressive nature, optimal management is not well-established. We therefore sought to describe clinicopathologic traits, treatment details, and survival patterns for patients with rNECs.
methodsPatients captured in the National Cancer Database (NCDB; 2004-2016) with rNECs managed with observation, chemotherapy, or proctectomy ± chemotherapy were considered for analysis.
resultsThe inclusion criteria were met by 777 patients. Mean age was 62.4 years, 45% were male, 80% were Caucasian, 40% presented with lymph nodes metastases, and 49% presented with distant metastases. Chemotherapy and surgical resection were administered in 72 and 19% of cases, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 0.83 years (1 year, 41%; 3 years, 13%; 5 years, 10%). During the study interval, 659 (85%) patients died, with a median follow-up of 0.79 years. On multivariable analysis, age ≥60 years, male sex, and distant metastases were associated with worse survival; surgical resection and administration of chemotherapy were associated with a reduced risk of death. Among non-metastatic patients treated with surgical resection, administration of chemotherapy was protective, while a positive lymph node ratio (LNR) ≥42% (median value) was associated with an increased risk of death. There was no difference in the number of examined lymph nodes between LNR cohorts.
conclusionsPatients with rNECs experience dismal survival outcomes, including those with non-metastatic disease treated with curative-intent surgical resection. Neoadjuvant therapy can serve as a useful biologic test, and surgical resection should be judiciously employed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34787737What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.