Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34787569›Full record

SynthesiseLife2021

Stronger net selection on males across animals.

Lennart Winkler, Maria Moiron, Edward H Morrow, Tim Janicke

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. On the resolution of sexual conflict over shared traits.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Metabolism as a screenwriter in the female-male coevolutionary play.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Lennart WinklerApplied Zoology, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3597-6540
Maria MoironCEFE, CNRS, Univ Montpellier, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0991-1460
Edward H MorrowDepartment for Environmental and Life Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1853-7469
Tim JanickeApplied Zoology, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1453-6813
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRKarlstad University · SETechnische Universität Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual selection is considered the major driver for the evolution of sex differences. However, the eco-evolutionary dynamics of sexual selection and their role for a population's adaptive potential to respond to environmental change have only recently been explored. Theory predicts that sexual selection promotes adaptation at a low demographic cost only if sexual selection is aligned with natural selection and if net selection is stronger on males compared to females. We used a comparative approach to show that net selection is indeed stronger in males and provide preliminary support that this sex bias is associated with sexual selection. Given that both sexes share the vast majority of their genes, our findings corroborate the notion that the genome is often confronted with a more stressful environment when expressed in males. Collectively, our study supports one of the long-standing key assumptions required for sexual selection to bolster adaptation, and sexual selection may therefore enable some species to track environmental change more efficiently.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalMating Preference, AnimalSelection, GeneticAnimalsFemaleMaleanimalsarthropodaevolutionary biologyvertebrata

Identifiers

PMID34787569
PMCPMC8598160
OpenAlexW3212938555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.