Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34787481›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2022

Fluoroscopy, CT, and MR imaging characteristics of a novel primarily bioresorbable flow-diverting stent for aneurysms.

Rosalie Morrish, Ronan Corcoran, Jillian Cooke, Muneer Eesa, John H Wong, Alim P Mitha

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Polymeric Nanomaterials for Atherosclerosis Diagnosis and Treatment.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rosalie MorrishDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, 2129University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1420-4699
Ronan CorcoranFluid Biotech Inc., Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jillian CookeFluid Biotech Inc., Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Muneer EesaDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, 2129University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
John H WongDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, 2129University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Alim P MithaDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, 2129University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAOncolytics Biotech (Canada) · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFive to ten percent of the global population have unruptured intracranial aneurysms, and ruptured brain aneurysms cause approximately 500,000 deaths a year. Flow-diverting stent treatment is a less invasive intracranial aneurysm treatment that induces aneurysm thrombosis. The imaging characteristics of a novel primarily bioresorbable flow-diverting stent (BFDS) are assessed in comparison to the leading metal stent using fluoroscopy, CT, and MRI.

methodsX-ray/fluoroscopic images of stents were taken using a human cadaveric skull model. CT and MRI were acquired using silicone flow models of residual aneurysms. Images were analyzed with Likert scales in anonymous surveys by neurointerventionalists. Quantitative measurements of radiographic density (CT) and artifact boundary size (CT & MRI) were also obtained.

resultsVisibility of the BFDS on X-ray was less than the metal stent but deemed adequate for deployment and intraprocedural assessment. The metal stent was more radiopaque than the BFDS on CT, but qualitative assessment was not significantly different for the two stents. MRI imaging was significantly better using the BFDS in terms of overall artifact and intraluminal assessment.

conclusionsThe BFDS has adequate visualization on X-ray/fluoroscopy and should be clinically acceptable for fluoroscopic deployment. On MRI, there is less quantitative artifact as well as overall improved qualitative assessment that will allow for more detailed non-invasive imaging follow-up of treated aneurysms, potentially reducing the need for digital subtraction catheter angiography.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedIntracranial AneurysmAbsorbable ImplantsCerebral AngiographyFluoroscopyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingStentsTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment Outcomeaneurysmscomputed tomographyflow diversionFluoroscopymagnetic resonance

Identifiers

PMID34787481
PMCPMC9706267
OpenAlexW3213138013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.