ArticleThe Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology2021
Comparison between the Linked Color and White Light Imaging Combined Score in the Evaluation of High-Risk Population of Gastric Cancer.
Article in The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Diagnostic Performance of Linked Color Imaging Compared to White Light Imaging in Endoscopic Diagnosis ofGut and liver · 2024Pooled it
- Novel endoscopic techniques for the diagnosis of gastricFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of linked color imaging and white light imaging for early gastric cancer and gastrointestinal metaplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Linked Color Imaging for Stomach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor patients undergoing gastroscopy, it is necessary to judge whether there is Helicobacter pylori infection, atrophy/intestinal metaplasia. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the light color imaging (LCI) and white light imaging (WLI) combined score during gastroscopy.
methodsEach included patient underwent normalized gastroscopy with WLI and LCI, and all notable findings were photographed. Four endoscopists reviewed the endoscopic images of each patient. The clinical information, results of the H. pylori tests were unavailable at review. The total LCI and WLI scores of each patient were calculated and their detection in high-risk populations of gastric cancer were evaluated. The diagnostic values of LCI and WLI for intestinal metaplasia were also calculated.
resultsIn total, 392 patients were included in the study. The degree of inflammation and proportion of active inflammation cases were significantly higher in the H. pylori gastritis group than in the non-H. pylori gastritis group; their endoscopic manifestations were also different. The LCI combined score improved the diagnostic value of each individual observation index in the diagnosis of H. pylori infection compared with the WLI combined score. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 91.9% (91.9% vs 81.5%), 91.1% (91.1% vs 80.2%), and 95.8% (95.8% vs 93.2%), respectively. The accuracy of LCI in the diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia was higher than that of WLI (83.4% vs 69.6%).
conclusionThe LCI and LCI combined score improved the diagnosis of H. pylori gastritis and intestinal metaplasia, and it is considered valuable in identifying the high-risk population of gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.