ArticleeLife2021
Urgency forces stimulus-driven action by overcoming cognitive control.
Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Multisensory integration of stimulus-driven and goal-driven signals during urgent saccadic choices.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Contributions of Distinct Attention Mechanisms to Saccadic Choices in a Gamified, Dynamic Environment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Phasic Alertness Impairs Cognitive Control by Amplifying Competition between Evidence Accumulators.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Contributions of distinct attention mechanisms to saccadic choices in a gamified, dynamic environment.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Urgency overpowers cognitive control by amplifying cognitive processing asymmetries.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Subcortical nuclei of the human ascending arousal system encode anticipated reward but do not predict subsequent memory.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Article
- Urgency enforces stimulus-driven action across spatial and numerical cognitive control tasks.PloS one · 2025Article
- Understanding vigilance and its decrement: theoretical, contextual, and neural insights.Frontiers in cognition · 2025Review
- Readiness for Perception and Action: Towards a More Mechanistic Understanding of Phasic Alertness.Journal of cognition · 2025Article
- Article
- Coupling of saccade plans to endogenous attention during urgent choices.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Stimulus salience conflicts and colludes with endogenous goals during urgent choices.iScience · 2023Article
- Exogenous capture accounts for fundamental differences between pro- and antisaccade performance.eLife · 2022Article
- Neurophysiological and emotional influences on team communication and metacognitive cyber situational awareness during a cyber engineering exercise.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Phasic Alertness is Unaffected by the Attentional Set for Orienting.Journal of cognition · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intelligent behavior requires to act directed by goals despite competing action tendencies triggered by stimuli in the environment. For eye movements, it has recently been discovered that this ability is briefly reduced in urgent situations (Salinas et al., 2019). In a time-window before an urgent response, participants could not help but look at a suddenly appearing visual stimulus, even though their goal was to look away from it. Urgency seemed to provoke a new visual-oculomotor phenomenon: A period in which saccadic eye movements are dominated by external stimuli, and uncontrollable by current goals. This period was assumed to arise from brain mechanisms controlling eye movements and spatial attention, such as those of the frontal eye field. Here, we show that the phenomenon is more general than previously thought. We found that also in well-investigated manual tasks, urgency made goal-conflicting stimulus features dominate behavioral responses. This dominance of behavior followed established trial-to-trial signatures of cognitive control mechanisms that replicate across a variety of tasks. Thus together, these findings reveal that urgency temporarily forces stimulus-driven action by overcoming cognitive control in general, not only at brain mechanisms controlling eye movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.