Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34787009›Full record

ArticleJournal of palliative care2022

A Goal-Directed Model of Collaborative Decision Making in Hospice and Palliative Care.

Karla T Washington, George Demiris, Patrick White, Holly C Mathis, John E Forsythe, Debra Parker Oliver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of palliative care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karla T WashingtonWashington University in St. Louis, USA.
George DemirisPenn Integrates Knowledge (PIK) University Professor, University of Pennsylvania, USA.
Patrick WhiteWashington University in St. Louis, USA.
Holly C MathisBarnes-Jewish College, Goldfarb School of Nursing, USA.
John E ForsytheCox Medical Center, Springfield, MO, USA.
Debra Parker OliverWashington University in St. Louis, USA.

Funding

A Problem Solving Intervention for Hospice CaregiversR01NR012213 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DEMIRIS, GEORGE · 2011 to 2021
$4.2M
ACCESS_Access for Cancer Caregivers to Education and Support for Shared decisionmakingR01CA203999 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PARKER OLIVER, DEBRA · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA203999NINR NIH HHS R01 NR012213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hospice and palliative care teams face numerous barriers to the meaningful involvement of patients and families in medical decision making, which limits opportunities for exploration of the very values, preferences, and goals that ideally inform serious illness care. Researchers who develop and test interventions to address these barriers have noted the complementary utility of two existing models in supporting collaborative relationships between hospice and palliative care teams and the patients and families they serve: (1) the social problem-solving model, and (2) the integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. This paper describes the integration and extension of these two highly synergistic models, resulting in a goal-directed model of collaborative decision making in hospice and palliative care. Directions for practice innovation and research informed by the model are discussed at length.

Indexed as

Hospice CareHospicesDecision MakingDecision Making, SharedGoalsHumansPalliative Caredecision makingfamilyhospicespalliative carepatients

Identifiers

PMID34787009
PMCPMC9106802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.