Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34786904›Full record

Trial reportJBRA assisted reproduction2022

Effect of Intra Uterine Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor vs. Human Chorionic Gonadotropin at Ovum Pick Up Day on Pregnancy Rate in IVF/ICSI Cases With Recurrent Implantation Failure.

Haitham Torky, El-Sayed El-Desouky, Ashraf El-Baz, Rania Aly, Osama El-Taher, Atef Shata, Ahmed Hussein, Heba Marie, Osama Deif, Ahmed Eldemery and 1 more

RetractedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Trial report in JBRA assisted reproduction, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 10 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Haitham TorkyDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology - October 6th University, Giza, Egypt.
El-Sayed El-DesoukyDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology - Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ashraf El-BazDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology - Al-Galaa Teaching Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
Rania AlyDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology - Al-Galaa Teaching Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
Osama El-TaherDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology - Al-Galaa Teaching Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
Atef ShataDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology - Matareya Educational Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed HusseinDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology - October 6th University, Giza, Egypt.
Heba MarieDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology - Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Osama DeifDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology - Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed EldemeryDepartment of Biochemistry - October 6th University, Giza, Egypt.
Ashraf Abo-LouzDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology - October 6th University, Giza, Egypt.
Al-Azhar University · EGCairo University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRecurrent implantation failure is defined as failure to achieve clinical pregnancy after the transfer of four or more good-quality embryos in a minimum of three fresh or frozen cycles in a woman aged less than 40 years. The objective is to compare between the effect of intrauterine G-CSF, hCG, and saline solution injection (as placebo) at the day of ovum pick-up on clinical pregnancy, chemical pregnancy, implantation, and miscarriage rates in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF/ICSI.

methodsThis prospective, double blind, parallel, randomized controlled trial included 150 patients equally divided into 3 groups, each containing 50 individuals. Subjects in Group 1 received intrauterine injections of G-CSF; Group 2: received intrauterine injections of 500 IU of hCG; and Group 3 received intrauterine injections of saline solution as placebo. The primary outcome measure is clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes are biochemical pregnancy, implantation, and miscarriage rates.

resultsClinical pregnancy, biochemical pregnancy, and implantation rates were highest in the group given G-CSF and lowest in the group administered saline solution; miscarriage rates were not significantly different between the groups.

conclusionsIntrauterine administration of G-CSF at a dose of 100 µg/1.0 cc at the time of ovum pick-up is associated with better clinical pregnancy, chemical pregnancy, and implantation rates as compared with intrauterine saline solution administration. Further studies are needed to determine the optimum timing of intrauterine administration of G-CSF that achieves the best results, and longer follow-up is needed to determine take-home baby percentages.

Indexed as

Chorionic GonadotropinEmbryo TransferFertilization in VitroGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorAbortion, SpontaneousFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy RateProspective StudiesSaline SolutionSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicChorionic GonadotropinGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorSaline Solutionclinical pregnancyG-CSFhCGintrauterine injectionovum pick-up

Identifiers

PMID34786904
PMCPMC9118974
OpenAlexW3211924592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.