Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34786880›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2022

Genomic prediction of preliminary yield trials in chickpea: Effect of functional annotation of SNPs and environment.

Yongle Li, Pradeep Ruperao, Jacqueline Batley, David Edwards, William Martin, Kristy Hobson, Tim Sutton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Assessment of genomic prediction capabilities of transcriptome data in a barley multi-parent RIL population.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Integrating targeted genetic markers to genotyping-by-sequencing for an ultimate genotyping tool.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yongle LiSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The Univ. of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5064, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3966-8596
Pradeep RuperaoStatistics, Bioinformatics and Data Management, ICRISAT, Hyderabad, 502324, India.
Jacqueline BatleySchool of Biological Sciences, The Univ. of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6001, Australia.
David EdwardsSchool of Biological Sciences, The Univ. of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7599-6760
William MartinDep. of Agriculture and Fisheries, Warwick, Qld, 4370, Australia.
Kristy HobsonNSW Dep. of Primary Industries, Tamworth, NSW, 2340, Australia.
Tim SuttonSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The Univ. of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5064, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achieving yield potential in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is limited by many constraints that include biotic and abiotic stresses. Combining next-generation sequencing technology with advanced statistical modeling has the potential to increase genetic gain efficiently. Whole genome resequencing data was obtained from 315 advanced chickpea breeding lines from the Australian chickpea breeding program resulting in more than 298,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) discovered. Analysis of population structure revealed a distinct group of breeding lines with many alleles that are absent from recently released Australian cultivars. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) using these Australian breeding lines identified 20 SNPs significantly associated with grain yield in multiple field environments. A reduced level of nucleotide diversity and extended linkage disequilibrium suggested that some regions in these chickpea genomes may have been through selective breeding for yield or other traits. A large introgression segment that introduced from C. echinospermum for phytophthora root rot resistance was identified on chromosome 6, yet it also has unintended consequences of reducing yield due to linkage drag. We further investigated the effect of genotype by environment interaction on genomic prediction of yield. We found that the training set had better prediction accuracy when phenotyped under conditions relevant to the targeted environments. We also investigated the effect of SNP functional annotation on prediction accuracy using different subsets of SNPs based on their genomic locations: regulatory regions, exome, and alternative splice sites. Compared with the whole SNP dataset, a subset of SNPs did not significantly decrease prediction accuracy for grain yield despite consisting of a smaller number of SNPs.

Indexed as

CicerAustraliaChromosome MappingGenome-Wide Association StudyPlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID34786880
PMCPMC12807065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.