Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34786848›Full record

ArticleApplied psychology. Health and well-being2022

Rhythms of the day: How electronic media and daily routines influence mood during COVID-19 pandemic.

Julian Zubek, Karolina Ziembowicz, Marek Pokropski, Paweł Gwiaździński, Michał Denkiewicz, Anna Boros

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Julian ZubekHuman Interactivity and Language Lab, Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4842-5609
Karolina ZiembowiczInstitute of Psychology, The Maria Grzegorzewska University, Warsaw, Poland.
Marek PokropskiFaculty of Philosophy, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Paweł GwiaździńskiDepartment of Philosophy and Bioethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University, M.C., Kraków, Poland.
Michał DenkiewiczFaculty of Mathematics and Information Science, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna BorosFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
University of Warsaw · PLHuman Computer Interaction (Switzerland) · CHInstitute of Psychology · PLJagiellonian University · PLWarsaw University of Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to investigate how daily activities affect mood in the context of social distancing guidelines enforced during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) administered four times a day during a 2-week period, we asked participants (N = 91) about their mood and the activities they engaged in. Seven individuals were selected for a follow-up, open-ended questionnaire. Results show that a stable routine, including physical exercise, hobbies, regular sleep hours, and minimal time spent in front of the computer, helps maintain a good mood. Coping strategies such as planning and scheduling help keep routines and circadian rhythms stable. Face-to-face contact is associated with a more positive mood, while similar interaction through electronic communication has a less positive effect. We observe an effect related to the infodemic phenomenon: Daily reports on COVID-19 cases and deaths affect mood fluctuations. This is an important consideration in shaping public information policies.

Indexed as

COVID-19AffectElectronicsHumansPandemicsPhysical DistancingCOVID-19daily routinesecological momentary assessmentinfodemicmoodsocial distancing

Identifiers

PMID34786848
PMCPMC8652828
OpenAlexW3213047535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.