Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34786612›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2021

Monitoring estrogen and androgen residues from livestock farms in Phayao Lake, Thailand.

Nawaphop Sutaswiriya, Supreeda Homklin, Torpong Kreetachat, Pilanee Vaithanomsat, Nathiya Kreetachat

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nawaphop SutaswiriyaDepartment of Environmental Engineering, School of Energy and Environment, University of Phayao, 56000, Phayao, Thailand.
Supreeda HomklinDepartment of Environmental Engineering, School of Energy and Environment, University of Phayao, 56000, Phayao, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0642-1917
Torpong KreetachatDepartment of Environmental Engineering, School of Energy and Environment, University of Phayao, 56000, Phayao, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3623-0580
Pilanee VaithanomsatNanotechnology and Biotechnology Research Division, Kasetsart Agricultural and Agro-Industrial Product Improvement Institute (KAPI), Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4280-2426
Nathiya KreetachatDepartment of Environmental Engineering, School of Energy and Environment, University of Phayao, 56000, Phayao, Thailand. nathiya.kr@up.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3132-9952
University of Phayao · THKasetsart University · TH

Funding

National Research Council of Thailand NRMS 4/2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate steroid hormone residues from livestock farms and assess their risks to the surface water of Phayao Lake. These steroid hormones are endocrine-disrupting compounds (EDCs), which can be found in natural and synthetic forms. This research focused on examining the residues of seven steroid hormones (five estrogens and two androgens-estrone (E1), 17α-estradiol (αE2), 17β-estradiol (βE2), estriol (E3), 17α-ethinyl estradiol (EE2), testosterone (T), and 17α-methyltestosterone (MT)) from four types of livestock farms around Phayao Lake, Thailand. The samples collected from the livestock farms included feces, soil, and wastewater and were extracted by the solid phase extraction (SPE) technique and analyzed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The risks from the residual steroid hormones were also characterized by estradiol equivalents (EEQs), testosterone equivalents (TEQs), and risk quotients (RQs). The results indicated that most hormone contamination from the farms' livestock was due to the estrogen hormones E1 (1.38-97.10 ng/g), βE2 (10.08-1366 ng/g), and EE2 (1.50-99.92 ng/g), which originate from the natural excretion and admixture of steroids in feedstock or medicines. Steroid hormones were not detected in the wastewater from cleaning processes on farms with wastewater treatment plants, whereas farms without wastewater treatment plants showed high values of estrogen hormone contamination, with EEQs of 128.8-472.9 ng/L and RQs of 208.3-294.3. However, the analysis of steroid hormone residues in Phayao Lake demonstrated that the residues did not severely affect aquatic organisms (with RQs of 0.002-144.5), and no estrogen or androgen residues were observed in the water treatment plant or tap water.

Indexed as

LakesWater Pollutants, ChemicalAndrogensAnimalsChromatography, LiquidEnvironmental MonitoringEstrogensEstroneFarmsLivestockTandem Mass SpectrometryThailandAndrogensEstrogensEstroneWater Pollutants, ChemicalAndrogensEndocrine-disrupting compoundsEstrogensLivestockPhayao LakeSteroid hormones

Identifiers

PMID34786612
OpenAlexW3212802664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.