Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34786607›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medical systems2021

Understanding the Accuracy of Clinician Provided Estimated Discharge Dates.

Olivia P Henry, Gen Li, Robert E Freundlich, Warren S Sandberg, Jonathan P Wanderer

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medical systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olivia P HenryVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, US.
Gen LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, US.
Robert E FreundlichDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, US.
Warren S SandbergDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, US.
Jonathan P WandererDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, US. jon.wanderer@vumc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3119-6873

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002245 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Julie A. Bastarache · 2017 to 2026
$9.3M
Reducing Reintubation Risk in High-Risk Cardiac Surgery Patients with High-Flow Nasal Cannula -the "I-CAN" studyK23HL148640 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI FREUNDLICH, ROBERT EDWARD · 2020 to 2024
$867k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002245NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL148640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discharge planning is a vital tool in managing hospital capacity, which is essential for maintaining hospital throughput for surgical postoperative admissions. Early discharge planning has been effective in reducing length of stay and hospital readmissions. Between 2014 and 2017, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) implemented a tool in the electronic health record (EHR) requiring providers to input the patient's estimated discharge date on each hospital day. We hypothesized discharge estimates would be more accurate, on average, for surgical patients compared to non-surgical patients because treatment plans are known in advance of surgical admissions. We also analyzed the data to identify factors associated with more accurate discharge estimates. In this retrospective observational study, via an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) approach, we identified factors associated with more accurate discharge estimates for admitted adult patients at VUMC. The primary outcome was the difference between estimated and actual discharge date, and the primary exposure of interest was whether the patient underwent surgery while admitted to the hospital. A total of 304,802 date of discharge estimate entries from 68,587 inpatient encounters met inclusion criteria. After controlling for measured confounding, we found the discharge estimates were more precise as the difference between estimated and actual discharge date narrowed; for each additional day closer to discharge, prediction accuracy improved by .67 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.67; p < 0.001), on average. No difference was observed on the primary outcome in patients undergoing surgery compared with non-surgical treatment (0.02 days; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.03; p = 0.111). Faculty members were found to perform best among all clinicians in predicting estimated discharge date with a 0.24-day better accuracy (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.27; p < 0.001), on average, than other staff. Weekend and holiday, specific clinical teams, staff types, and discharge dispositions were associated with the variability in estimated versus actual discharge date (p < 0.001). Given the widespread variation in current efforts to improve discharge planning and the recommended approach of assigning a discharge date early in the hospital stay, understanding provider estimated discharge dates is an important tool in hospital capacity management. While we did not determine a difference in discharge estimates among surgical and non-surgical patients, we found estimates were more accurate as discharge came nearer and identified notable trends in provider inputs and patient factors. Assessing factors that impact variability in discharge accuracy can allow hospitals to design targeted interventions to improve discharge planning and reduce unnecessary hospital days.

Indexed as

Patient DischargePatient ReadmissionAdultHospitalizationHumansLength of StayRetrospective StudiesDischarge planningElectronic medical recordsEstimated date of dischargeLength of stayManaging hospital capacity

Identifiers

PMID34786607
PMCPMC8696264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.