Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34786532›Full record

ArticleGeoHealth2021

Testing Homes for Potential Sources of Lead Exposure as a High-School Science Project.

Evan M Sefchick, Daniel Dusevic, Jack R Dougherty, Andrew Terraciano, Tyler Ellis, Alexander van Geen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeoHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Evan M SefchickPelham Memorial High School Pelham NY USA.
Daniel DusevicPelham Memorial High School Pelham NY USA.
Jack R DoughertyPelham Memorial High School Pelham NY USA.
Andrew TerracianoPelham Memorial High School Pelham NY USA.
Tyler EllisLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University Palisades NY USA.
Alexander van GeenLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University Palisades NY USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2073-9841

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-school students tested soil, paint, and water for lead (Pb) in a total of 80 houses in their town of Pelham, New York, where blood-Pb data indicate relatively high levels of child exposure. All the samples were tested in the laboratory using established procedures but this was preceded by testing of soil and paint in the field with a kit by the students. The total Pb concentration in 32 of the 159 soil samples that were collected exceeded 400 ppm, the EPA standard for bare soil in residential areas where children play. Only 4 of the 118 tap water samples that were collected contained over 15 ppb Pb, with the data showing that flushing for 2 min clearly lowered Pb concentration further across the board. The highest risk of child exposure may be posed by old Pb-based paint, however, which was detected in 9 of the 48 samples that were tested. Residents were also the least willing to let the students test or sample their paint. High-school students could help reduce exposure in the many towns where child blood-Pb levels remain high today by identifying sources and, while doing so, learn about environmental science and measurement from this hands-on experience.

Indexed as

citizen‐sciencelead exposurepaintsoilwater

Identifiers

PMID34786532
PMCPMC8576849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.