ReviewCureus2021
Therapeutic Outcome of Burn Patients Treated With Hyperbaric Oxygen.
Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Overview of Recent Developments in the Management of Burn Injuries.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Simultaneous Administration of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy and Antioxidant Supplementation withMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Visualization and Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends on Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amongst various interventions for burns and inhalation injuries, hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has recently been widely integrated as an adjunctive management of care due to its therapeutic properties in reducing tissue hypoxia, pathological inflammation, and augmenting neovascularization. However, the limitation of human clinical trials and data undermines its efficacy to be implemented as an adjunctive therapeutic modality in burns. The purpose of the literature review is to determine the efficacy of HBOT as an adjunct to standard management in burns. A review of the literature was done by searching PubMed, Cochrane, Medline, EMBASE, and Google Scholar for papers addressing the comparison of therapeutic outcomes between HBOT and non-HBOT in burns. Current research findings are conflicting, and the use of HBOT as an adjunct in burns management is still controversial. Therefore there is still a need for more data and research on the therapeutic benefits of HBOT in burn management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.