Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34786242›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) in Incidental Segmental Fused Vertebra and Comparison With the Effect of Stabilization Systems on ASD.

Mehdi Hekimoğlu, Ahmet Başak, Atilla Yılmaz, Hakan Yıldırım, Ahmet Levent Aydın, Kursat Karadag, Ali Fahir Özer

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mehdi HekimoğluNeurosurgery, American Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.
Ahmet BaşakNeurosurgery, American Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.
Atilla YılmazNeurosurgery, Okan University, Istanbul, TUR.
Hakan YıldırımRadiology, American Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.
Ahmet Levent AydınNeurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, TUR.
Kursat KaradagNeurosurgery, Atatürk University, Erzurum, TUR.
Ali Fahir ÖzerNeurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, TUR.
Atatürk University · TRKoç University · TRAmerikan Hastanesi · TROkan University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Adjacent segment disease is a controversial process after spine stabilization. The two important factors discussed are natural aging and hypermobility in incidental segmental fusion anomalies; patients have two or more fused vertebrae from birth, which are the results of spinal movement restriction due to the fusion of some spinal units. This article's main purpose is to determine the degree of relationship of hypermobility and the aging process in the deterioration of the disks adjacent to fusion. Methods In this study, the degenerative process developed by hypermobility in the adjacent segment due to incidental segmental fusion was evaluated. The MRI images of 52 adjacent and nonadjacent disks of 45 patients in total were analyzed according to the Pfirrmann grading systems. The average Pfirrmann rating of the disks just above and below the fused segment and the distant first, second, and third non-neighboring levels were evaluated and calculated, respectively. Results The highest rate of incidental fusion is determined on the cervical area with 51.9%, followed by the thoracal area with 32.7%, and the lumbar area with 15.4%. Damage to the adjacent segment disks in cases with incidental fusion can still be seen at any age, with fusion, indicating that the hypermobility effect plays a more prominent role. The evidence of hypermobility without aging is that the segments adjacent to fusion undergo more degeneration than the distant disks. Conclusion Adjacent segment disease is under the influence of many factors. Our findings suggest that its incidence is increasing with the pathological processes initiated by hypermobility. It seems that, at least, it carries equal importance as compared to age. Fusion surgeries damage the adjacent segments under the influence of the passage of time beyond the physiological aging of the patient.

Indexed as

adjacent segment diseasedynamic stabilizationfusion surgeryincidental fusionspine stabilization

Identifiers

PMID34786242
PMCPMC8578681
OpenAlexW3205292747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.