ArticleCureus2021
Evaluation of a Novel Contactless Electrical Impedance Device for Measuring Respiratory and Heart Rates: A Pilot Study.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility of a Card-Type Respiratory Rate Measuring Device for Spontaneously Breathing Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the respiratory rate is an important vital sign, it is rarely recorded in hospitals given the lack of convenient measurement devices. Posh Wellness Laboratory Inc. (Tokyo, Japan) developed a novel contactless card-type respiratory/heart rate monitoring device that measures electrical impedance variations on the human chest. This study was aimed to test and validate the accuracy of the proposed device compared with conventional medical monitors. To evaluate the card-type monitoring device, we compared the measurements from the device with those from the mechanical ventilators and electrocardiogram monitors. Patients who were hospitalized in the Emergency Department of Shimane University Hospital from April 5 to 30, 2021 were included in this study. A card-type sensor was attached to five patients who agreed to participate in this study. Four of the five patients were receiving mechanical ventilation. The respiratory rate error provided by the card-type sensor remained within 15% compared with the measurements of the conventional medical monitor. In contrast, the heart rate counts were largely different from the measurements. Thus, the proposed device can successfully measure the respiratory rate, whereas heart rate measurements require further improvement. Our small, lightweight, radiation-free, and contactless monitoring device can conveniently measure the respiratory rate of patients. With the improvement of measuring the heart rate, we would like to assess a larger number and a wider range of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.